What are the differences? Are they different enough to warrant adding both?
I’m not sure how much worth there would be to add a 5E AND 5F.
The 5F is just the 2-seater trainer version of the 5E.
And if it is indeed a swiss subtree then it would need to be a plane switzerland fielded. The P-51 would fit that.
Ah I see.
Two seaters are tight tho. I’m a little biased on this
1 Like
I just looked at the proposed swiss austrian tech tree. I will look for the differences
do you have a link for that?
1 Like
Seems like one simply doesn’t have Mavericks, but they could limit the missles aswell
I’m just looking at this lol.
But yea EKW C-35 could be an option, I don’t see how gaijin would add two F-5s
1 Like
yeah maybe without the EKW. But P-51 can’t really fit either because it would need to be a specific version and germany really doesn’t need a p-51
2 Likes
So it’s back to the P-16 : D
2 Likes
BTW was this plane already guessed? Gszabi said all planes were guessed
that would be a really nice addition aswell with the rocket launcher in the fuselage and unique
Yeah, the P-16 would work.
Then it could be
P-16 [CHE]
F/A-18C [CHE]
F-5E [CHE]
5 Likes
Yea,
F-5E
F/A-18
P-16
are my guesses
2 Likes
Or maybe this?
N-20 [CHE]
3 Likes
Now that a sight though the P-16 is more likely
That plane looks cool. Like a mini bomber
4 Likes
We are already at the 1 unique vehicle per sub tree limit with the F/A-18C though, so I doubt it.
2 Likes
I’m sure we shall see, since Gaijin added the Mig-21 Bison to the GB tech Tree as a Premium due to the British and India politics, Australia had the F-111 in the RAAF so there is a 50/50 chance we might see one in the GB Tech Tree.
If this will be a form of a sub tree where do they put them since they all can’t be premium or SV.
There no room in line one or two well the F/A-18 may be after the ICE.
Could line 3 work ?