Both the Japanese ICVs, the APC variant lost out to the patria in the Type 96 Trails,
So the Two sibilings (the ICV and the RCV), which are both Mitsubishi Heavy industry projects, and based on the Type 16.
The cousin is the Mitsubishi MAV which lost the Type 96 replacement trials.
Why would they add both?
Yes
meh, just in time really… look when last years first devblog dropped. 1,5 weeks from now ish
well, it’s pantsir’s problem, not A-10c’s
a lot of them were transfered to the bundeswehr too and had their markings changed before eventually being decomissioned
thats what you get if you are a split country .
i wonder how gaijin would tackle the Korea topic… :D
It’s just a case of we add it now because if we don’t Russian mains will cry and scream
I swear it looks like one of these guys
Sure. Like I said, I don’t really care about it. I can’t be arsed to play air RB in general and there is nothing really incentivying me to grind an A-10C.
I just wish we would get something that is actually useful for the US top tier lineup, like the SEPv3. But I can’t fully complain because the T1E1 90mm is on the list and Italy seems to get a top tier SPAA finally.
Yeep hahahah
It just looks mean
Why should Russia get another SPAA?
What about Japan and israel?
They both need long distance SPAA’s.
Edit:
And no Dutch vehicles???
While not the same, they are largely similar, so I guess they might be modelling both at once, hence showing up at the same time to the leakers. They might save the RCV as a premium or as an Event, as it’s not in service/had orders yet
Btw, the IJN amagi is an aircraft carrier…
So…
So Japan is getting 1 vehicle and an aircraft carrier model…
Laid down as a battle cruiser though, so :shrug: wait no, they reused the name
Amagi might refer to this though, which is what I thought of at first
Clearly the small gap in spaa between 10.7 and 11.7 was too hard on the russian playerbase and they deem the israeli Chap peak AA design.
Pretty sure they’ll use the battle cruiser model.