did you do the same for r73
2 Likes
Never did, cause I always thought a “fix” was always around the corner for R-73, it seems clear now that’s not the case.
1 Like
To be honest, I’m not sure the game needs fully functional TVC. It’s a good balancing thing for R-73 and Mica-EM. The only thing that suffers is SRAAM, but Gaijin won’t put it at a sensible BR.
2 Likes
where is dev？🚪🦍
2 Likes
Making a missile only function when it feels like working isn’t balance. Its rng.
2 Likes
If Gaijin wants to nerf TVC, they should nerf the thrust vectoring degrees. But having it spin out inconsistenly makes it hard to account or compensate for it. Atleast if they nerfed TVC, I could try and find ways to put myself in a better position, I don’t mind that. But as someone said, RNG/inconsistency isn’t good for reliable gameplay.
I tried to use the sraam, wtf is it it is like a ufo
1 Like
on vacation it seems
SRAAM are a really good 1000m Missile
use it above 1km and it won’t do it’s thing
1 Like
it gotta show off its thrust vectoring
1 Like
It’s realism and balance. Balance in the sense that it affects the capabilities, realism in the sense that everything in war thunder is generally perfectly reliable which isn’t realistic.
The example of AP fuses not having any chance to fail, springs to mind.
We implement cannon dispersion, why not also weapon failures?
3 Likes
What is that and how is it bending reality to its will
No devblog again? :(
1 Like
Sadly
failed sub launched ballistic missile, likely on a test.
1 Like
1 Like
That’s a nuke? Tf?
Yep.
Thats a missile capable of carrying a nuke. 99.9% certain it didn’t have a nuclear warhead onboard.
1 Like