No, let’s talk Shermans instead.
So much YAP about the Canadian Leopard when no matter what nation gets the thing it’ll be forgotten about at most 2 weeks into the patch
3 Likes
Like MiG-21 91-93?
1 Like
Lets talk about the Royal Navy. The most powerful surface combat strength between 1812 and 1940, and how they lacked a competent top tier battleship.
3 Likes
Who would win:
Britain
Basic economics (austerity is unfathomably stupid)
3 Likes
How how the Bison breaks everything because the devs aren’t original lol
AJAX, as it stole all the money to fix rubber pads in the tracks
8 Likes
Ahh yes, a classic story.
Tell me if you’ve heard it before.
We want a powerful vehicle, but we’re going to make it cheap by using off-the-shelf components. Since we’re using tried and tested parts, it surely won’t be costly or time consuming to develop.
We’ll also make the program cheaper by setting the goals to marginal levels.
The costs will never spiral wildly out of control, fall behind or cripple the program.
(this is totally not an F-35 callout post)
1 Like
You fogot the part where one (or more) of those responsible for making choices gets a completly unrelated cash boost and job proposition (and some other unrelated coincidences).
Yes I meant 230
ah yes minister just a great show
That’s something called job perks. It’s like when people had unions.
1 Like
Never ask right wing “sensible spending” guys why borrowing is at record levels and all the money supposedly being saved by privatisation (which is actually causing spiralling costs despite worse performance) is mysteriously in offshore bank accounts of donors.
I mean it’s not like the rest is a lot more armored tbf
Just enough armour to be heavy and slow, but not enough armour to mean much except against some older autocannons.
Leopards are slow?
Not for its time, but from a modernisation prospect, yes.
Also
Oh blimey
At least the one in WT is a tech demonstrator so it keeps that HP
Yeah… So Chally 3 isnt gunna have any decent mobility in WT.