Sometime this week is my bet for the usual pre-teaser devblogs and we still have 1 or 2 Roadmap devblogs yet to drop. So they could also be this week. Im guessing at least one or other today
Then teaser could be this week or next week. But if its this week id guess friday
I love how people are moaning about F-16 vs Mig-29.
But if a third world war breaks out isn’t that what gonna happen anyway ?
Plus there already Mig-29 vs Mig-29’s fight going off as we speak…
Id say for 12. Its usually 1300 to 1400 GMT, assuming that is the only dev for the day. Given there is two then one should be around 1100 and one at 1600. Teaser day will see the dev dropped on the same time. However I doubt that gaijin have(or has one but usually not used) a system that allows them to post things at a timed occasion like the forum for official website.
Shh we don’t talk about that lol
I was just chatting with people I game with. One thing they mentioned is that Britain might potentially get a new pack vehicle that replaces it(the rooikat). However its unlikely to be the desert warrior as 1, it would cause major upsets, 2, IFVs are generally GE premiums as opposed to packs like VBCI and 2S38, 3, I would assume its because its not as good selling as the challenger DS now it gets L26. But given its gaijin I wouldnt be surprised if the desert warrior costs 8k GE.
When I was playing the HuAF 9.12B sometimes I just wanna climb high, then I met smth on 12o and launches an R-27ER1 at them, only to get slammed in the face with one and splashing the enemy at the same time.
Peak submarine gameplay, gotta use a tick timer.
Yeah. Like 6 in the morning for me over here in PST.
1am for me
I mean in real life
Same well your time props slightly slower since you a bit south from me :P
A southern eww /j
Well back in Eritrea there were fulcrum vs flanker already, and its a thing in the 1990s. Now Houthis uses Iranian copies of QW-2 missiles to down CH-4 drones of the Saudi air force, both made in China. Lmao
Northerners know how to read time?
:P
So yea when people say Mig-29 vs Mig-29 is unrealistic read some history lol
Thank goodness I like reading history lol.
I just hate the purist mind set because at the end of the day this is a game so have fun.
If you don’t then you know where the door is : P
.
I also strongly dislike people who calls for “HiStOrIcAl MaTcHmAkInG”, my chap, this is not a milsim, its a 10-ways free for all. There could be US Britain China and Japan fighting Russia Germany Italy France Sweden Israel, as of immersion is anywhere existent in 90% of the players heads. If there are any, I suppose then the grind kills that thought before they reached where they want. They dont make them self look anywhere supreme by calling for concepts they dont even understand.
If people want historical matchmaking then disable most high tier Swedish, Chinese and Japanese vehicles, with the very few exceptions being stuff that fights in Ukraine or stuff like VT4 which was currently in action in Africa. Israel would have to be limited to the Middle East, Japan can only spawn vehicles in Japan, China cant spawn vehicles outside of MBT2000 or VT4 unless its pradesh, etc.
Thats what Sim is for anyway. Though Id not say no to some better team comps in the fuutre
Well thankfully, i’m not one of “Those” people who wants everything to be historical, I go base by how fun will it be. If it’s fun then yes if not then why would I bother.
Yea we once had historical matching and I was a young pilot then so I can’t remember much about it.
but yea it would get boring quiet fast and weak planes will get dumped on and become unusable.
The only “Historical” I want is:
Names. Far too many things are running under fake/made-up names. As it’s led to a lot have been calling vehicles the wrong things.
Models. Relistic makes it good-looking.
Neither of which affects the belief (well many the models but that should double as realistic)