Same well your time props slightly slower since you a bit south from me :P
A southern eww /j
1 Like
Well back in Eritrea there were fulcrum vs flanker already, and its a thing in the 1990s. Now Houthis uses Iranian copies of QW-2 missiles to down CH-4 drones of the Saudi air force, both made in China. Lmao
3 Likes
Northerners know how to read time?
:P
So yea when people say Mig-29 vs Mig-29 is unrealistic read some history lol
Thank goodness I like reading history lol.
1 Like
I just hate the purist mind set because at the end of the day this is a game so have fun.
If you don’t then you know where the door is : P
.
I also strongly dislike people who calls for “HiStOrIcAl MaTcHmAkInG”, my chap, this is not a milsim, its a 10-ways free for all. There could be US Britain China and Japan fighting Russia Germany Italy France Sweden Israel, as of immersion is anywhere existent in 90% of the players heads. If there are any, I suppose then the grind kills that thought before they reached where they want. They dont make them self look anywhere supreme by calling for concepts they dont even understand.
If people want historical matchmaking then disable most high tier Swedish, Chinese and Japanese vehicles, with the very few exceptions being stuff that fights in Ukraine or stuff like VT4 which was currently in action in Africa. Israel would have to be limited to the Middle East, Japan can only spawn vehicles in Japan, China cant spawn vehicles outside of MBT2000 or VT4 unless its pradesh, etc.
2 Likes
Thats what Sim is for anyway. Though Id not say no to some better team comps in the fuutre
1 Like
Well thankfully, i’m not one of “Those” people who wants everything to be historical, I go base by how fun will it be. If it’s fun then yes if not then why would I bother.
1 Like
Yea we once had historical matching and I was a young pilot then so I can’t remember much about it.
but yea it would get boring quiet fast and weak planes will get dumped on and become unusable.
The only “Historical” I want is:
Names. Far too many things are running under fake/made-up names. As it’s led to a lot have been calling vehicles the wrong things.
Models. Relistic makes it good-looking.
Neither of which affects the belief (well many the models but that should double as realistic)
2 Likes
Yeah F-16C/J would be pretty cool
Yep, speaking of realism I even seen some players/yp’er moan about how clouds go on for miles.
I mean like isn’t that how clouds behave when there a storm on the way.
You would notice these things if you were to Idk go outside :P.
2 Likes
They obviously havent lived in Britain. Coming over for almost finishing the third year undergrad i would recognize the in game weather as two types: whats going on outside the windows and whats better than going outside the windows
1 Like
I don’t think I have heard that one before of people complaining about the clouds in game,
which that is the in best & kind way of saying this ‘Odd’ to complain about something like that.
1 Like
Yea they do exist but in small numbers
Are you sick and tired of CAS? Do you play Naval?
Well may I present the solution to all of your woes:
R-73 boat
8 Likes
Ok now that totally off topic
I just play HMS Tiger and spam a thousand 3inch HE-VT shells for that or HMS London or HMS Renown and fire off an isnane amount of MG fire.
(though i do hope for Type 21 with Sea-Dart sooner rather than later)
What’s the best B-17 in game?