nuhuh
Lol
I have seen him in here before doing this same thing. And it honestly hurts because this is where the stigma of how Americans are come from. I spent time in Naval Aviation myself and literally only come on here to dispel this type of stuff but it never stops. I also hate when I see “F-22 and F-35 so good all other NATO planes suck”. I personally love our canard powered neighbors across the pond. I think I even told @Hyrikul I spent time with some of his countries pilots at some point lol.
2 Likes
u should be a comedian, would fit you well
I have the feeling this was aimed at me xD
1 Like
Now, they are adding hmd, there is no such thing as the superraptor or whatever, my brother is joining the forum in a sec and he’ll tell yall
Just finished my bachelor degree in chemistry, so I don’t feel like switching profession now.
Every plane is wonderful, they are designed to do there own roles which makes me wonder why put them in a sim dogfight and compare them, this isn’t a dick measuring contest
So now everyone needs to suac and stop arguing
Tac that means you too.
Now you have to choose either to believe it or not
they wanted proof i gave them proof
oh no lol I love the frenchies on here if I had to go by recent times probably the guy that tried claiming the uk doesnt need any of their blueprint battleships in the future because we have aircraft carrier, man was just infuriating to deal with
3 Likes
Oh great here’s miraz
He believes in some bogus information regarding the F22
go read its above
Damn it’s a bunch of toddlers on here
So do you want to signal more than a software upgrade? Because the HMD requires helmet and sensor changes. The article is talking about software integration of newer BLUFOR tracking/Communication between aircraft and also allowing for newer armament. But also, is this an official US Air Force article like you said it was? Because I don’t remember Defense One being our PR department.
No he’ll be sleeping or chasing children
(Joke)