tbf on that one gaijin said they wouldnt add a SA air tree not they wouldnt add a single plane
They said if they add anything it would be a premium but then they changed their minds
I still don’t understand why the DF 105 is not in the French tree ? (yes, this story again)
Just like the AMD 35 Kwk 50 cm ?
And where is the M4A1 Revalorisé (French prototype M-51)
Even on the Israeli side still no M-50
3 Likes
While yes, Swedish top tier is in good condition (I think), lower BRs could use a little love, primarily the lack of an SPAA from 4.3 to 7.0, and that 7.0 SPAA is the ZSU-57-2 so that’s just a TD in disguise, so you really don’t have an SPAA that’s good against jets until 8.7. Also could use a more complete 6.7 lineup that isn’t 2 tanks with paper armor with no depression and 2 jets that are probably as effective as a potato.
Sincerely,
USthunder
1 Like
Do we actually have sources that confirm that the FEP uses the NGAP armor package that the SEPv3 uses though?
Because I could also just see Gaijin add the FEP as an HC with better thermals and M829A2 without such sources.
Yeah nah, if Gaijin has shown anything it’s that this would be 11.7 just because of the APS.
Well, all sources I can find at first glance state is that it was “upgraded with 3rd generation uranium components”, I would have to investigate further…
…but… yeah, from what Gaijin stated on their M1 Dev Blog, apparently they don’t think hull armor was improved on ANY “Abrams production variant”, not even SEPv3, so… XD
For BS reasons such as “too heavy for the suspension”, etc.
2 Likes
It’s possible, I’d rather see it as a research vehicle but recommended it as a premium because there’s always a likelihood it’ll end up that way.
1 Like
Please no, I like occasionally winning, 43% average w/r is already low enough lmao.
Motherf*cker I’d buy it too, dangit!
Don’t you dare Shay. Or they’ll put all of Yugoslavia into the USSR tree.
3 Likes
Unironically, I hope they retroactively add that it to the T-90M. Turret was designed for it afaik.
Or at least for whatever they do for the next T-90M, obr. 20XX whatever.
1 Like
Was designed and implemented are different things
There is no evidence, that it has gone into service
Experimental features cannot be added to game, as we have seen from abrams DU armor and abrams TROPHY on sep2
The only exception is t80uk thermal, but that just consequences of russian devs
As well as for 2s38 which is fully paper
I havent taken it out of nowhere, just remember that it was one of the excuses of devs in abrams DU topic
Swedish Gripen C with PS-05/A Mk.3 radar like Gripen C from SAAF & HuAF but active radar homing BVRAAM armed Rb.99 from Gripen A, never access AIM-120C-5 and IR & TV AGM-65 Maverick
But I assume JAS39C Gripen basic from HuAF & RTAF access AIM-120C-5 AMRAAM
Currently china tech tree lack early multirole fighter with active radar homing BVRAAM at 12.7 BR
I predict gaijin might considered give AIM-120C-5 on F-16A Block 15 ADF (USAF), F-16A Block 20 MLU (ROCAF), F-16C Block 50 (USAF) and Gripen C (HuAF) in 2nd or 3rd major update of this year
JASDF no fighter aircraft with ARH BVRAAM
I’m not sure gaijin could add 3rd gen or 4th gen fighter aircraft with active radar homing BVRAAM at 12.7 for Israel tech tree in next major update ?
Isnt the thermals found on the t80u for russia based on the modification given to the swedish T80u as i k ow they mounted agava therm to it because it was a feature sweden was looking for? Correct me if im wrong but the t80u russia has in game shouldnt have thermals.
I was showing the T80B
I know i was just mentioning it because i saw you mentioned the therms for 2s38
No it shouldn’t but one did test it so it gets it for balance i guess
i meant the Dart for the 2S38 its at the bottom
I know the dart is fake as the 2s38 was made as an AA vehicle. Was just adding to the list of bs they give to russia. Like the yak 141 getting irst despite never having it irl.
1 Like