in the protection analysis it can pen it, i dont know if they are also able in a match
obviously, it also penned in the simulation, except it barely did so
also the fact gjn doesnt model quality and uses a different formula
two AIM-9L but no flares )))
i mean at 10.0 it wouldnt be that bad, you can still get rockets
Personally I’d just put it at 9.0/9.3 with two AIM-9G. Also idk where did you get info about them carrying Python 4 nvm just realised it’s P4 as AIM-9P lol
i meant aim 9 p4, but did Thailand use the aim 9G?
I don’t think they did so two AIM-9P at 9.0 would be fine
i dont know if 9.0 with aim9p is a good idea, they should be fine at 9.3 with those
I mean that’s without flares
i also meant without flares, i dont know 9.0 with aim9p is kinda low. another options is that they give it the flare pod, it may be ahistorical, but it would allow you to balance it better
might be low but AV-8A without flares wouldn’t have much going for it at 9.3 especially without AIM-9G
it also wouldn’t have RWR
So Harrier Gr1 with no flares and no RWR at 9.7?
they did had rwr
and SRAAM
Yep basically. Tho Gr1 should go lower imo at least with current SRAAM. If they got fixed it would be fine at 9.7
No RWR in sight
Yeah, that I agree with, SRAAM would slap if they ever got fixed/finished, though that BR needs a major decompression too
i think that it is the same that the gr3 use, but im not sure as the lower part of the tail also have something else which i dont know what it is, AV-8A
here they claim that it is an skyguardian form marconi but i dont know how true that claim is
Aye I didn’t notice the British RWR. I was kinda looking for American one around the wings and tail. It should be indeed Jaguar / Harrier GR.3 RWR (ARI 18223)
yes it looks line one of those, also it would be nice to have a image of the cockpit but i havent seen one online