Why are you so serious?
1 Like
Because there’s no logical reason not to be. He said something without context, and I asked what the context was. That is all there is to it.
Well tbh our world isnt logical too. Not everything have to have an answer lol
2 Likes
That is correct. I never said that everything has a logical answer, however.
Its ok to just not reply to people making obviously spammy, wishlisty posts.
4 Likes
It’s also okay to ask for context.
We aren’t saying that we are saying can you tone it down a bit as we want to make this thread easier to use 😊
2 Likes
All I can say is please follow the guide lines and rules and be mindful for the other person on the otherside. 😊
1 Like
There is nothing wrong with asking a question in a non-derogatory or obnoxious way, but okay.
Wouldnt the wolverine survive better though? Its based off a bison and also fully commonwealth before the US mains tries to steal it(they have the avenger)
What do guys think about the plz 83 130?
7.3 15.5-11.9 seconds loading, exactly the same shells as the IS-7, 26 first ammunition racks
When comparing it to the Obj120, that would seem right. Could probably manage to be at 7.7 aswell
Id say 7.3, effectively an unarmored IS-7
please 83 130
What’s that? a translation error?
2 Likes
It is confirmed as BR 7.3 from datamine
PLZ 83 130, the new event tank, basically an unarmored IS-7
Chinese miltary acroym for a tracked artillery piece, PLZ (Paobing Liudanpào Zìxíng).
The PLA are a big fan of 3 letter acroynms. WZ or VN etc are factory/manafacturer designations.
Whats PGZ then? Paobing ---- Zìxíng?
What does it mean?
The Wolverine might not exist.
As we* could only find 1 photo and no sources that it was even tested bar an old forum.
*
I brought the vehicle up in the Canadian vehicle research discord.