I do not say that all of the feedback was ignored - but there was a lot about the M18 and also some about the naval changes resp. the SKR7 issue but not even a comment about these (naval)
1 Like
COUGH French, Israeli, British IFV’s… COUGH COUGH.
Collectively from the whole community. In addition, many of the changes came directly from feedback here on this forum like the AMX, Challenger 2 Mk 3, Spitfire Mk 24 and G.91Y/YS to name a few.
2 Likes
oke, thanks for the clearance.
Name another nation that has continuously had a top 2 MBT for 4 years straight? You can’t.
Let that sink in. For the past year the Strv 122s have always occupied either the best or second best place in terms of MBT.
Which seems pretty favored to me.
1 Like
BVM, leopard 2A6
We’re currently gathering evidence showing that developers had addressed one comment with 31 likes on the RU forum regarding the Barak modification tree even though there were far more popular requests in terms of numbers of comments and likes that were not addressed on the US/EU forum. Would be good if further clarification on how devs decide what to respond to would be good.
This was in regards to only one comment with 31 likes, which can be found here in a multi-vehicle post.
We know that currently there were multiple posts and hundreds of likes for other requests such as AMX-30 DCA or Batchat, and they did not receive any feedback. We’re still collecting evidence to showcase the disparity for now.
6 Likes
Really confused about the BR changes. None of the British jets got adjustments, despite a good amount of community feedback suggesting the Hunter F.1 should probably go down in BR… on and off the forums.
But hey, Gaijin clearly listens to feedback!
Sadly the Devs can’t respond to each and every single point raised. If something is noted and they can’t respond, then naturally the answer is shared. It’s not simple a matter of the most likes is always guaranteed to get a response.
1 Like
We aren’t asking why developers can’t respond to every single point raised. We are asking why they cannot prioritize responses to the most received feedbacks rather than responding to a one-off post that had a multi-vehicle suggestion.
7 Likes
I mean, anyone could’ve told us that, just look at the top comment on the original thread lol.
The 2A6 spent at most 6 months in the top 2 before the BVM knocked it out (Strv 122B was still in said top 2).
BVM only spent around 2.5 years in the top 2. The Strv 122 also quickly overtook it as first place when they got m/95 a year after the BVM was added.
my focus is not on top tier, because this is not the main thing the game is around, the game is around much more then just those 8 or what top tier mbts, i would never judge a nation on it peak, its the way there
Is it possible for you to see if the Devs have something more elaborative regarding the VEAK change? It was a big change that came like a bolt from the blue
In this instance it has nothing to do with a multiple vehicle post. It’s simply a logical thing that needed to be addressed and resolved for a top tier aircraft.
2 Likes
BTW when a lot of people, ~300, are saying certain vehicles are not properly balanced
and gaijin response is “our stats say its balanced”
well… large number of people aren’t agreeing with your stats… So a more detailed answer would be nice.
Looking at the stats of 2S38 could be very misleading. I often see it brought to 12.0 where it logically won’t perform as well as 10.0. Are the stats of the games that are +2 BR excluded? Its a popular top tier premium, are the stats of brand new players excluded?
More detail into how things are anaylzed would be nice. Actual real data would be even better because vague statements such as “our stats say its fine” aren’t very satisfying when giving feedback.
12 Likes
Cant wait for this thread to get locked lol
4 Likes
What is the problem with the modification research branch on the Barak?
Has anyone been killed through a wall with a shell?
1 Like
Yes, you can also get killed through a dead tank corpse.