Which would be yet another step away from a potential historical matchmaking, and further complicate IFF in Ground SIM.
I’d rather have two TTs like this: PRC/DPRK, ROC/ROK, as this would actually line up with IRL political alignment.
5 Likes
When gajin consider new generation target designation pod (targeting pod) better AN/AAQ-28(V) Litening II and CLDP on aircraft nato standard at late rank VII ~ rank VIII ?
I despise the concept of historical matchmaking. Whenever someone brought this up, they usually wanted to swing the argument in their favor, saying superior German machines tiger vs T-34s but only got swung back with US mains asking for free CAS.
For GSB just the same. If there is an “impostor”, just ban it. Taiwanese machines as well as T-72M1s from three trees just gets blocked out.
GSB needs a rework where it was based on individual machines and who they belonged to as well. If tankers in Ukraine can identify same soviet-based designs just by looking through each others camo, why not war thunder.
As I acknowledged.
You say “extremely weak side armour” like everything at top tier that isn’t Russian doesn’t have that.
Well, when it comes to autocanons, it’s still better to have thick composite skirts and/or ERA than just a naked 35mm thick plate.
Not to mention that, by side armor, I am also talking about the turret. Type 10’s turret side armor is just 35mm, while every other Western/NATO tank has composite armor that makes it autocanon proof.
Also Type 10s other than the TKX P have applique armour on the sides of the turret.
They don’t- they have a 5mm thick storage box.
That makes a whopping 40mm thick turret side armor… compared to Leclerc’s 185mm KE turret sides, or Leopard 2s’ 290mm KE.
The Type 10 turrets are the only Top Tier turrets vulnerable to autocanon fire!
It’s modelled incorrectly, then.
Uh… no?
6 Likes
That’s where the crew keep the body pillows.
14 Likes
idk if japan has something in there but In tests, the turret could stop RPG 9’s on the side of the turret so im not sure if there is supposed to be anything in there
Same, it’s my favorite plane, ever.
Personally, I don’t really mind that? I don’t need a perpetual grind for the game. I just like playing the game and having fun. The game also constantly changes so even if I’m using the same vehicle, I keep getting new experiences.
That is to say, I think Gaijin also shouldn’t worry about holding the F-2 for later because they worry nobody will play Japan air after they get it since it’s “done”.
On top of that, the MiG-29G is the furthest that the Eastern fighter line in the German tree can go, so we know that Gaijin isn’t against adding true end of the line vehicles right now.
2 Likes
If push comes to shove I can see them ether adding trail things or orded but not arrived thing
I.e F/A 18 or the Su 27
They will get Hornet,it will just be Swiss one and TT,but first they get ICE. And EFT as last.
Swiss one will be more powerful there for might as well get a dumbed down Tyhoon
F35 as last
1 Like
But Typhoons are far away,Smin said it, and Hornet makes a lot of sense cause they can add it to 4 nations at once if they really want, And we all know how Gaijin loves copy paste stuff,like 4 same M109s in single patch.
1 Like
Did Germany decided they want F-35s now and ordered them?