Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

I hate this dude since a video about Rafale where it’s say it’s worst than gripen or EF because it have like 0.86 twr, when IRL it’s slightly inferior of the EF twr (but with a lower drag), but is still > 1…

Not a goddam ~0.80 ! Would be worst than Mirage2000s…

4 Likes

Like how is it carrying a nuke or something

1 Like

Same lol

1 Like

Just 30s of aerial show and you can know it’s not 0.86 twr xD

Résumé

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKfFrw9d2UI

1 Like

idk how a " detailed pillbox " would even work, compared to the methods of damaging them we use now. Would much rather they were all replaced by tanks half-sunk into the trenches like that one version of Bastogne tbh.

More pressing imo is replacing the low-poly AAA deathzones w/ properly player-level-modelled stationaries, like the one from the Sturmtiger event*:


The " time = damage " modelling currently in use isn’t healthy. Not when there 's no tactical level of play that can deal w/ it apart from " ceasing to interact w/ the objective area ".

*or the several AA guns and high-angle HMG 's from Enlisted

Could, but lets not get ahead of ourselves. Wait for this new one to appear in WT 's own files etc. etc.

3 Likes

i have no doubt that its higher then 1
It comparable to the EFT so it should be similar

1 Like

You know what, time to suggest a universal carrier with WASP
I goddamn love flamethrower tanks

1 Like

I’ve never given much thought to YTer opinions, especially when it comes to technical background things. I used to hold a flight instructor rating and can’t hear a YTer talk about aerodynamics or performance without making atleast one mistake so never give it much thought. Except Defyn, he’s too damn funny and understands more than he lets on I think.

They are usefull as people sitting behind their computers all day scouring community leaks etc.

4 Likes

Indeed. I just want the 2Pdr Universal Carrier.

Like, look at this thing. I love it.

Spoiler


i0lwPBl

4 Likes

Enlisted has you covered there too:
image

But flamethrower-tanks w/o effective regular guns will likely not become playable here in WT, if they even come at all. This recent comment from @magazine2 echoes what was said abt the possibility of the KhT-130 and Pz.II F when they were found in the files here, ahead of being added to Enlisted.

Remind me the gun on the Lorraine 37L on the first picture somehow ^^

Cute tank

Eh my computer isnt very happy for more games, but I will take a note.
I mean they can work, I recently put up this post, and because it only fits in at 1.0, it can always gaurntee itself roasting AAs playing FPS, like flakpanzer 1 or ta-se, i suppose.
Not so much about shermans, theyre way too armored for 1.0.

Ignore your computer and embrace GTFO

1 Like

AIM-120A and B would be identical in WT just saying

1 Like

You guy’s think we have any chance of seeing this in the next update? It could be after the strela.

4 Likes

possibly

1 Like

Would be a rather welcome addition

1 Like

theyre both from the chinese guy, the 2nd 3rd and 4th are just from a messenger, considering ur in the server u should know

i wouldnt count on it, while yes they are trying to impersonate, it can very well may be a disguise since olivia is a known leaker

1 Like

Right, value added because I personally had no clue how it scaled along the alphabet.

Any idea how the differed? WT always adds new mechanics so might make a difference at some point.