Indeed and that was what I was talking about, an independent tree of a REDFOR nation.
Poland or Czechoslovakia work for a Warsaw pact nation.
Well we can consider Yugoslavia but they are a “GREENFOR” nation at the end of the day.
Thanks I didn’t exactly know what the term for neutral nation under this “FOR” system.
I’ve only seen it under the Wargame series.
Given, Yugoslavia also used a fair amount of western (based) equipment
Coolest Leopard
you are right, my bad.
that post hurts my heart
We know their still a few challengers that can be added though
My favourite right now being the AL hussein
I’ve read through the proposed Visegrad TT multiple times, but i couldnt but notice the Hungarian and Romanian vehicles in the TT.
Hungary got added to Italy and IIRC they said that Romania will be going for Italy as well.
So that would make visegrad tinier.
their naval TT is almost none-existent and their Helicopter tree is oké, but mostly things we already have ingame. except for the MIL and PZL helicopters.
even then, i just dont like essentialy the 2nd best vehicle of a developer nation being given to another tree. Sweden and finland already was an insult in my opinion.
On top of that planning the SG for japan, when japan first should get the thai sub tree as well, no need for the SG
Besides that canada isnt part of the UK tree, Uk will only be given vehicles that fit and the commonwealth vehicles are even then either event or premiums and the 2a6 propably wont be either in the near future
commonwealth seems to be if Britan needs it it gets it so ADATs is a example
comparing a needed spaa and an mbt when uk has its challenger serious is a whole different matter xD
The leopards are not needed or fill a niche
The Canadian leopards shouldn’t come to the game if they can’t be with the rest of its stuff.
canada is already split in the first place sooooo yeah
How many times for me to repeat that it isn’t set until formalized
Romania isn’t part of V4 tho, so it’s inclusion in V4 proposals is a bit strange
not saying they are needed now but in the future they might
IIRC in big quotations
And this is already a big problem. I don’t know why I should push for my stuff if I’m just being told I can’t make an historical line up with stuff that served together.
Simply put if Canadian stuff is going to be split up then we have already everything for Canada that should come in-game anyways.
Well Gaijin did state it, but that was several years ago, so that’s hard to hold them to with their track record
And to clarify sth, i dont have essentialy have a problem with leoaprds in other trees, but at one point its to much when the best tanks of every nation ends up being a leopard its just plain boring.
There is already 3 main users Germany, Sweden and Italy (in the future)
Now people want to add them on top to UK,Japan, earlier israel with chile was mentioned.
There is spain,greek that can end up in different ways, proposed benelux and switzerland is leopards.
Sorry but that realy just ends up wayyyy to boring for my taste. If nearly most propositions end up being leopards
if they fix the challengers it wouldn’t be the case
but thats unlikely
if they did that UK wouldnt need any leopard in the first place