Those are still the June 2026 stats, this is the top 6 of 12.7 in terms of K/D in july 2026:
2 Likes
is 5 lines of vehicles in a techtree the limit or could there be more?
The day Gaijin discovers scrolling horizontally in TT 🤯
Seriously though, for now the current config works. It’s… an ideal or rather, easier way of visualising vehicles throughout history.
Spoiler
But also, could you imagine the endless Bf 109s, Spitfires, etc. all in different lines because “well this plane actually had this one thing about it that was so different from the usual differences that it deserved its own line”
2 Likes
Man, I know its incredibly unlikely, but I really wish we got submarines this update they’ve been working on them for so long… Though given the current focus on Nuclear escalation even the hopes of a submarine test being possible in the near future seems unlikely…
1 Like
Uparmored Leopards: top K/D because they are the best tanks.
Modern Abrams: top K/D because they are the second best tanks and are currently being spammed by the best players.
Merkava Mk.4M: top K/D beca- MERKAWHAT?! (it also has the second highest WR among all these tanks)
1 Like
Oh god I smell a British Eurofighter nerf.
3 Likes
Jarvis, add 500 more 2020s Russian vehicles
2 Likes
Afaik it was once said by either Gaijin staff or BVVD himself that the 5 vertical lines are hard coded into the game and that it is basically impossible for them now.
They may have some workarounds planned for the future but since they say that they are happy with the current UI/UX and won’t do any major changes, my hopes for this are rather slim
i was thinking about it since they said theres no limit to subtrees, even though there is very limited space in techtrees right now
I mean we know that the T-90M arena is getting the improved side ERA. Not that it will help it much, but the july 2026 stats at least make me understand why.
3 Likes
Honestly, I don’t think the T-90Ms should be Top BR.
Sure, being 12.3 wouldn’t change much, but at least they would cost less SP to spawn in 12.7 matches (which would still be most), so that would be… something? xD
3 Likes
Sry but cope, no known planned radar, rwr or weapon capacity, unless you have some sekrit USSR documents to bash something together like the Yak-141
Same BR as the Centauro 2… Crazy that they decided to move THAT up but not the BMPT…
Gaijin when people have skill: NERF NERF!! RAISE BR!! TOO OP!!
Referring to what, are you here??
Honestly, if they applied ALL of the following changes, Centauro 2 may be worth something;
-Autoloader’s rate of fire should be 3 seconds.
-The loader, who’s sitting right there, should be able to load the gun manually when the autoloader is emptied/broken, instead of locking fire till the autoloader is replenished/repaired (5 seconds aced).
-The time to replenish the first order rack should be reduced.
3 Likes
The T-80BVM 2023 will surely come trust.
(It will instead be a third T90M variant)
I’m seeing that as a modification
Just like they added the ERA mod to the BVM sometime later after its release.
1 Like
None of what the su47 had as it was only a tech demo.
If the systems are known Gaijin can add a hypothetical production fighter variant, like the Yak-141, Ho-229, J6k1, etc. The problem is we literally don’t know what the planned systems were, if development even got to a point were systems were definitively chosen.
I don’t think they’ll add it without finding solid proof that it’s supposed better reverse speed actually exists.
1 Like
Seems too complicated for this game or probably just too niche to care about.