I guess decrease maximum battle rating for Air battle mode to 15.7 before introduction current-gen long-range active radar-guided Air-to-Air Missile
4th gen fighter aircraft and early 4+ gen fighter aircarft (AESA radar and modern PESA radar) with initial service 5th gen infrared Air-to-Air Missile
Question though?
Where would the Trump Class Battleship sit?
Still future USA tech tree when we get missile ships…
You’re forgetting the singular most important question :
What ship more problematic (and even more fake) than Soyuz can the soviets have if we go by this rule ?
I’d much rather have a fixed Soyuz and iconic ships fighting and not drawing board ones with (most likely) the same balancing issues.
France is also most likely to receive a new top tier blue water ship, though i have no idea what it could be since afaik there’s no battleship left that would respect the “laid down” rule after Gaijin kind of fumbled with the addition of Jean-Bart as premium.
I can’t say whether the list of Ar 234 B-2, Duke of York, and Giulio Cesare will be true or not, but it’s from the same person who got the premiums of the last update right.
That long list? No.
That part seems to be more of a long-term one, they first posted about it about a month ago.
F-15EX in fake leaks but no Su-35 🥀
F-15IA in fake leaks but no Su-35 🥀
The “cool aircraft” teased by CM in Discord… please be Su-35 ☹️ If not, MiG-31 will do
i would like the mig 31 more, we have Sm-2,mig 31 is more nedeed
I’ll let you in on a secret: the A-150 fits the “unfinished” category, since its guns and turrets were already produced. So he will appear in the game sooner or later.
Suggestions and implementation criteria aren’t the same.
Really?) The developers think differently)
wow thanks we totally didn’t know
Like has been said numeros time, suggestion can be made if the vehicle have unique part made for it (like the german O class that had the engine made i think)
For implementation in game is still Laid Down for naval
“Passed to devs” doesn’t mean it’s going to be implemented, it only means that suggestion has been forwarded to devs for review.
Smin already denied F-15IA , since it is not handed over yet
That’s why the A-150 will also appear in the game.
It’s just a matter of time.
Hello Smin, what about these two bug reports(considering it’s quite an easy fix)?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/h6MB1wHE4KNc
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Tw4aC19ynsBN
thx in advance
Yes, yes, yes, the only nuance is that if some part of the ship’s design hadn’t been created, it wouldn’t have even been accepted in the proposal. It’s also written in the rules.
But as we can see, the proposal was approved.
By the way, the design for the German Type “0” battlecruiser was also approved, although only the engine was built, and the ship itself was never laid down.
F-15EX for USA tech tree maybe early batch production (pre service)
But gajin not ready add F-15IA before service
I guess might be Su-35S (mid 2010’s service)
Another Sukhoi or MiG ?
The germany tech tree missing night fighter variants
Indeed. That’s because, under their “ship must have been laid down” criteria, produced guns, turrets or engines counts; because while it isn’t strictly that the hull itself began construction, you could say that the ships themselves DID begin construction.
Montana’s 127mm turrets were made and installed on Midway-class carriers after being cancelled;
A-150’s main guns we’re made and scrapped after being cancelled.
Why should Soyuz be implemented with fantasy armor which it could never had had, but not these ships which had their construction started?
The only difference between A-150/Montana and Soyuz is that they were sensible and feasible designs which could actually have been physically and logistically constructed as designed, unlike Soyuz’s ingame implementation.
Your solution to a broken unrealistic ship is more non-existing ships?
the soyuz was laid down
