Yes,T72AV and T72A
The tanks are.
T-72B in the first 2
in the third line we have T-72AV TURMS-T and T-72A
I am sorry but is this even solvable?
2 Likes
Considering you can do all the combinations with adding TVD and unspecified ERA value to TURMS-T, as well as removing unspecified ERA value to 72A, no.
Engagement bait, if not a mistake
Still fun though
1 Like
hold up you might be onto sth here. ERA and NVDs
I think it’s 32
(80 (they are 2 overlapping blocks of era) +
36 (the first tank is missing the thermal sight) *
12 (tge second tank is missing era)) / 16
If the T-72A would have been first, it could have worked. As in T-72A + Thermals + ERA = Turms
The first tank is T-72AV TURMS-T, it gains the Thermal sight over the standard B, + it gains more ERA
How much do you subtract and why? 1 brick is worth 10. So, how much?
By brick i mean this, a single one, not 2, not 4
Those two first would be 52 though, or? 4 blocks of ERA is 40, 2 is 20
The person here cant calculate
T72bs in prev equation are also missing thermals tho
omg didnt even see that, dont mind the image
The last line of the puzzle is
(80(or 70)+(52+16+?)*(52-?))/16
Should we count the exact amount of ERA blocks on the 72B or what?
It will be worth more than the whole tank, by a landslide
I think turms has bigger scope and clearly visible commander sight. And mg is shifted right due to commander sight.
Yeah but what do you subtract from the T72B to get the A? 40 or 20?
（80+68*12）/16＝56
1 Like
We dont know, thats the issue.
We also dont know how much to add to get TURMS-T