@Smin1080p_WT sorry for bothering you again but I noticed something regard Leopard 1, A1A1 and 1A2:
Currently, the gunners’ sight has a switchable 8x to 15.9x magnification, however, the gunner-sights the vehicle has irl are both fixed to 8x and 16x respectively.
With the rangefinding-sight (TEM-2A) having fixed 16x- and the auxiliary-sight (TZF-1A) having fixed 8x magnification.
Now given that both sights are shown as gunners’ sight with the 8x-15.9x magnification values when hovering over them, I am wondering whether this value was chosen to essentially “combine” both sights (?)
…and as such, whether this is intentional or perhaps instead based on the (incorrect*) assumption that the gunner’s sight in these vehicles features a switchable magnification ?
This issue would only affect Leopard 1, Leopard 1 A1A1 and potentially Leopard 1 A2 (Uncertain whether the italian one had the same sighting equipment).
The other variants use different sighting equipment (such as EMES12 on Rad90/2K and EMES18 on 1A5)
Is one of the issues with Aircraft just straight up team kills? A near miss 500 lb AN-M64A1 bomb from a P-51 is going to cause a lot of annoying oops I took out the enemy squad and friendly in the same building :-p.
Spoiler
Maybe try attack drones like the Strike UCAV they do handle infantry sometimes and there loadout can be adjusted.
Try 1/6th, there 's only six vehicles ( all non-researchable, as part of the battlepass ( also monthly )) in each of Mobile 's normal updates, plus the three event vehicles in the tri-weekly subscribers gamepass. Compared to the 40+, mostly researchable, in WT 's majors.
Not necessarily, they’ve done single vehicles from not-yet-in-WT-NF nations as event or battlepass prizes before, like they did w/ China, Argentina, Finland, Spain, and Greece. While it wouldn’t be a complete surprise if more ships from any of those nations, or Austria-Hungary, were to appear in the future, it 's also not something that there are clear indications for at present either.
Also, you might want to temper your expectations for anything that would be below Reserve BR if in WT; the only* things below that in Mobile have been the April Fools prize coastal boats, and they’ve already said in Q&A that they don’t plan techtrees for small fleet.
*we haven’t exactly seen where submarines will be placed BR-wise yet here, and it’ll get off-topic for this thread if we were to speculate at this time.
The following are standard targets, which essentially depict the absolute minimum performance a shell has to bring. The average/typical and maximum performance of these shells is (almost always) much higher;
For example, 35mm APHEI-T has a standard target of a 40mm RHA plate at 100m, but penetrates 40mm RHA at up to (and demonstrated to be capable of doing so beyond) 1000m.
The following are standard targets, which essentially depict the absolute minimum performance a shell has to bring. The average/typical and maximum performance of these shells is (almost always) much higher;
For example, 35mm APHEI-T has a standard target of a 40mm RHA plate at 100m, but penetrates 40mm RHA at up to (and demonstrated to be capable of doing so beyond) 1000m.
TKB-075 AMDS (Anti-Missile Discarding Sabot) could also be interesting as this shell has been designed to pierce through like a billion platings in sequence to destroy anti-ship and air-to-ground missiles.
Its' standard targets + data (again, minimum performance) reflect that:
