pretty sure we allowed it because it would help us decide weather we go for the L/55 on the Challenger 3 or a 130MM aswell
1 Like
they already exist and serve the purpose of housing similar vehicles
1 Like
Not every squadron vehicle is indicative of a sub tree. For example the Leopard 2PL. Poland is not a German sub tree.
Just there have been some lead examples. (T-90, Hunter, F-5 etc)
6 Likes
but it was another thing that went against what the community wanted (like the F-14D being premium the implementation of the KH38MT etc) which could be considered a controversy
can Rafale fully sustain a 5g turn (0 energy loss) at 35-40k ft at mach 1.7?
most likely
Girl… It was never for the LEP or chally 3 program and it’s pretty clear who lead it too it literally being called rheinmetall defense 130mm testbed (no challanger in the name) and the fact rheinmetall was the only company on the side of the tank and even it was tested IN GERMANY
shouldn’t Canada be in USA tree?
1 Like
The 130mm was never in consideration for today it’s a consideration for in 10 years or whenever it’s needed to be able to fit the 130mm without many issues
Nahh, clearly the Testing range in Unterlüß is clearly in the UK :3
I am still coping for the PL-12!!!
Why?
Clearly that’s such a British name as well
ik they exist tell me how a new prop varient will change your game play for props and the prop meta?
Don’t we have PL-12 in game?
Are there any plans for a British maverick carrier below 10.7? One of the many other Hawk options or something equivalent?
If not please consider this message to represent significant player demand.
Rheinmetall defence 130mm gun testbed “challenger 2”
for it to be not a glorified sparrow and a response from the supposed instability investigation
Specially with the ü in the name :3
north American?