Never, as it did not exist.
Your posts are not being ignored. This is not a BR feedback topic. That sort of feedback should be kept for the BR topics. Not here.
Nothing to currently announce on that.
1 Like
guess your not allowed to sleep you gotta be on and answer everyone thats what I feel the op was getting at
1 Like
Seems like it sometimes. Gotta be here 24/7 365 ))
3 Likes
Day 38, Singaporean subtree for Israel when.
3 Likes
Day 1223 of waiting for Polish tech tree
2 Likes
Why does the replay always lack the player’s actual perspective? As you can see, you can’t click to switch it.
i just get my shuteye then wake up and start asking and coping about the challenger 2 again, the best way to live :D
Is this a server replay or a local replay?
To my knowledge local replays can only record the player perspective of the player who recorded said replay.
Hey @Smin1080p_WT I have a few questions.
-
Are there any plans to decompress top tier air BRs to 15.0+? Top tier definitely feels very compressed at the moment, especially with the premium Su-30MKs being forced down into 13.3, which also affects 13.0-12.3, and so on and so forth. It would be nice to see some differentiation between certain high tier vehicles as well. For example, the F-15C GE shouldn’t have the same BR as the F-16CM PoBIT, but due to compression they’re the same BR, and neither really deserves to go down.
-
A recent devblog discussed the improvement of guidance logic and thrust behaviors for the AIM-54 and ARMs. I’m curious if there are any plans to implement either or both of these for modern Fox-3s.
-
Can we expect an update to the Thales Scorpion HMD symbology anytime soon? Considering a variety of F-16s got it this update, an updated symbology would be very nice.
2 Likes
Apart from 6.3, every BR has a vehicle but instead of insanely uptiered Spitfires, better Spiteful or Seafang can be placed at 6.3/6.7
Hello
-
This would be something announced in a planned BR changes newspost or with the expansion of top tier via newer aircraft.
-
As we mentioned within the blog itself:
" we plan to add this mechanic to all other missile systems"
- No current ETA. HMDs and MFDs are two examples of things receiving constant updates and improvements. Sadly its not possible to say when on spesific items.
can we expect another round of br changes any time soon?
3 Likes
i thing he has already said that is too soon after the update to have br changes and they still gathering data or something like that
Were getting a new nuke plane? and its an f16? hell yea
2 Likes
maybe for NE the su-24 and F111 and the Tornados are outdated , nuclear rafale incoming?
2 Likes
since we got a J-11B ASM fix surely we will get a PL-12 response atleast (cope)
The tech tree still lacks:
- late P-63s (P-63E/F)
- late P-38s (P-38K)
- late P-47s (P-47D-30, P-47M)
- late F4F (FM-2)
- early F6F (F6F-3 or F6F-4)
- FR-1 (should be tech tree, seriously bruh)
- F8F-2
- late F4U (F4U-5)
- late AD/A-1 (A-1J since A-1H is premium)
- early B-17 (B-17D for example)
- glass nose A-26 (A-26C-25-DT, A-26C-50-DT)
- PB4Y-1
- night fighter variants of various planes (F4U-4N, F8F-2N, F7F-1/2/3/4N…)
- OV-10 (not a ww2 prop but still really cool to have)
- P-59 (P-59B, for real where is it)
Do you need more or is that enough?
The US tree has a crap ton of props but that doesn’t mean it has everything it can get
2 Likes
im gonna be honest I doubt they will be that much stronger then the current top dogs, again they have to sacrifice a lot of missiles to maintain stealth and stealthy itself isnt really a thing warthunder.
to be completely honest I think things like the F22 are over hyped, don’t get me wrong I think its a good plane but I dont think it will be as strong as everyone thinks it is.
1 Like