Was it the Arjun Mk.1A or the MK.1 shown on the 2026 teaser?
Prepare to be heart broken again next update.
4 Likes
Me every major update ever since the 2A7s were added :')
Seriously, SEPv3 has been overdue for 2+ years or 10+ updates now…
3 Likes
I’ve noticed and agree.
2 Likes
That would be hilarious. Britain 10.7 is already a goated lineup (probably the strongest 10.7 lineup overall, or shared strongest together with Sweden), I would need to buy another crew slot to make space for it.
So even since the leaks were made up, do we still think the M1A2 Sep v3 has a chance?
New top tier MBTs for all nations in innevetiable eventually, though what some nations will get is unknown. Though I dont think the SepV3 would actually change all that much for the US, especially if it was added alongside “equivalents”.
The only thing we know is likely for next major update is ARM
i dont get the hate.
the mk1a has 550mm of pen round
a 1500hp engine that pushes it to 70kmh
i dont know much of the armour but it looks usable and i think it has NERA/ERA
the tank looks quite unique being a mix of a chinese tank a T90 and a leopard 2a4
3rd gen commander & gunner thermals
laser rangefiner and LWS
a pretty good fire control system
and doesnt it have a softkill APS
definitely a solid tank for a lineup but it shouldnt be an excuse not to buff the challengers
1 Like
none of the electric system for them was installed so it could carry them but not fire them
Because rather than actually fixing the British MBTs in the British TT, they will just slap Indian MBTs in instead and call it a day. They’ve already done it once before with the T-90 C&P and the SPAAs
1 Like
yeah no i get that but arjun or not there probably not gonna fix british mbts (oh and it has penetration cum blast)
yes lets stock grind with 60 flares out of 120
what they actually need to do is gives full load of AIM-120A while you grind the AIM-120C or full R77 while grinding R77-1
Flares and chaff should be a stock only reaserching thing should be MAW+BOL
it would be really nice if they would folder all three of them honestly (The 10.0 Tornado without PGMs should have never been added anyways) its really dumb that i have to research the same plane again for even more RP just for the ability to mount LGBs and a tgp and nothing else.
From an Air PoV, Id agree (though even then, that 0.3 lower BR actually looks quite good and im slowly picking my way down the Italian air tree for that among a few other things)
but I actually really want a Tornado GR1 (early) for a 10.0 GRB Tonka. Id use it quite a bit.
Though the (1995) is a huge waste of time. Its inferior to the Ret 8 in GRB and inferior to the IDS and Ret8 in air modes. There is literally no reason to ever touch the (1995)
i think britain would highly benefit from a better cas vehicle for 10.7 cause neither the hawk 200 buc s2b or phantom fgr 2 are that amazing
Jaguar GR1A is very solid imo, it just needs the RWR upgraded (It is the Jaguar GR1B in 99% of respects, only upgrade its missing is the digital RWR) and TIALD correctly modeled (should be Gen 2, or at the very least 1.5+).
After that, they just need to drop the Hawk 200 down to 10.3 and the Hawk 200 RDA down to 10.7, ideally also upgrading the RDA to AGM-65Ds. Would put it on par with the A-10As.
I was joking when i said they would add it at the same time as the T-14 and KF51 but i can honestly see gaijin doing that and their excuse would be that they are giving it M829A3 with the Anti-ERA tip so it will be fine. (DM-53 will conveniently not get it)
1 Like
i dont hate the jaguar but 2 laser guided bombs at the same br or similar br to like the a7d or su25 or something like that its ehh
also yes make the RDA 10.7 and give it agm65d (i wish u could carry something other than a sea eagle on the middle pylon)
Yeah, though the ability to stay out of range of most SPAAs is nice, you can make those bombs count.