I have a question
Is there any plan to fixe the catapult ability for the j15t
Its a known issue yes.
There’s a dev stream for the upcoming 2nd infantry CBT starting in 45 minutes.
3 Likes
oh peak means the CBT might not be that far away
They did say it was going to be this week in yesterdays announcement. I’m guessing it will most likely start tomorrow.
But I hope it stays for longer than just 2 days like the first CBT.
2 Likes
Is there an eta because its a bug that should’ve been fixed before the update since it was reported during the dev
Its been a couple days since the update and this matter should’ve been resolved
You’re gonna hate me for this, Smin.
Soon™
So there are plans for vehicles that infantry can use. Hopefully we see this expanded to helicopters and IFVs.
But also Gaijin has a great opportunity to add in Jeep Stuff and bring back the Jihad Jeep from Battlefield.
[Edit] Apparently infantry travel on IFV’s is planned.
Also should be user skins too.
4 Likes
wonder if they will work as a mobile spawn point like enlisted with the LVTs and Halftracks
Maybe, but since there are plans for actual transport vehicles they might have it like in Battlefield where there’s passenger slots.
Not gonna lie it is interesting but WWM returning would be x10 interesting for me.
If you can somewhat port battlefield to war thunder, you could have definitely returned WWM in 6 years.
Cool, so I guess we now have to prove that a vehicle actually used the cannon it has ingame irl or what is this now?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/U5mfCM5XaQLf
It’s quite literally a company designation for a weapon that doesnt change with the system (The system-name does, not the cannon-name)…
This is so incredibly ironic considering that all KDA’s (i.e. every tank with a KDA and KDE) were nerfed based on a source for GA35 (a different weapon) - but I need to prove that vehicles with KDA’s actually use KDA’s irl now because “the model may have errors”?
Have we completely lost it?
@Smin1080p_WT could you give a clarification for this and (if applicable) confirm that we now need to also provide a source that the weapon a vehicle has ingame is actually the weapon it had irl when reporting literally anything about the cannon on a specific vehicle?
other reports shut down for this reason btw;
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/HTvu14RjWtG3
(strikethrough doesnt wanna work, so italic it is…)
Community Bug Reporting System
Community Bug Reporting System
Edit: The reports on TPK 6.41 and R3 T20 FA-HS were updated and forwarded.
Ig I will try to find sources for each ingame-user of KDA / KDE - hopefully such that actually list the full weapon designation (i.e. the company-designation) instead of the abbreviated one (which is also not identical to the current ingame name).
So far I have; Gepard, Gepard A2 and XM246 with 1:1 company designation
Marksman with abbreviated designation only
Type 87 - havent checked yet
Type 89 - need to find one listing KDE
→ Now I dont know what sources are required, because I certainly wont be getting a primary one on Type 89 or 87 specifically that lists the english (or german) company-designation (Oerlikon 35mm automatic belt-fed cannon type kda) since they’re japanese…
Honestly making me question whether I should continue making bug-reports at all, if they’re treated with the least amount of effort and shut down for completely absurd and unjustified reasons.
Guess next time I’ll have to prove that my leopard 2 is infact a leopard 2 and not a leopard 1 when reporting it, because the model could just be wrong!
6 Likes
Merkava Mk.4’s general existence ingame is just sad… superheavy 2000s 12.7 MBTs incapable of withstanding 3BM42 anywhere at all.
Ah yes,the cope of Merkavas having good KE protection when in reality they have barely any and everything was thrown on CE protection from RPGs.
3 Likes
Urban legend
oh boy im sure this wont cause any arguments