9.3 material for sure got 3 new br ranges to re-break
1 Like
Hmm, guess no dovbleg today.
Sadge.
You completely clueless if you think that would be less op
Wasn’t the new event the dev blog…
no [development] tag = not devblog
also that ship will still get its real devblog someday
It’s cute that some of you believe that Gaijin hasn’t fixed these 3 year old reports because they are somehow still unaware of them lmao.
They certainly are aware, they just either keep it purposefully broken because it’s fine according to their odd notion of “balance”, or simply don’t care and claim that it’s “low priority issues” which definitely justifies not spending 27 seconds fixing it in 3 years.
3 Likes
I need the SL crates back
obviously im not a dev but fixing a ready rack ammount sounds like the easiest job ever and the fact its taken them 3 years is criminal and theres no way its for balance because look at the abrams and the t80 and the leopard
1 Like
Exactly; same goes for Type 10’s broken steering, etc.
All it takes is changing a single number on a single line of code.
Or, in the case of CR2’s missing spall liner, add a rectangle geometry with spall lining geometry to the LFP, which they have proven to be able to do instantly on dev servers because it’s just not that hard of a thing to do.
Yet they claim that they don’t do it for years because “they can’t fix everything instantly”… lmao.
Like we are asking something that would take more than a few seconds.
4 Likes
wait are you being dead serious its just a line of coding?
In Type 10’s steering case, yeah. Even YOUTUBERS and myself separately were able to implement the fix via user mission.
I even made yet another bug report giving the instructions on a silver plate to make it even easier, but it got instantly rejected because “bug reports showing broken lines of code are unacceptable”.
Instead, they merely “accepted” the first report as a “suggestion”, and… here we still are.
17 Likes
More and more 80 buck premiums.
God, I really hate being so bitter, I really do. I generally try to be happily enthusiastic and positive…
But I can’t help it when such issues remain for so many years despite so many reports. So much community time, passion and effort wasted.
5 Likes
Work on buffs for the BMPT
4 Likes
add premiums
4 Likes
The 2 issues that are infuriating me at the moment is the Typhoon’s lack of UV filter and squished HUD (especially given that A) Aircraft like the Rafale got UV filter day 1 of dev server after it was reported and B) the HUD use to be correct and was changed resulting in the current squished appearance)
and unlike some issues where it could be claimed that the fix wasnt done due to “balance reasons” (despite their claims that historical accuracy is always the priority) these changes have no balance implications at all.
Another would be the sooty exhaust on a number of aircraft
we all do but its impossible not to be when the community is being neglected this much (other than the chinese community)
3+ years on issues that takes changing a single line of code to fix or in another way 3+ years to give a tank good steering or spall liners or a ready rack the most basic fixes but they just dont do it for some unknown reason, we could get an update fixing every top tier tank in a lot of ways and it probably wouldnt take that much time. probably not more than modelling another 9 premium su30s
you 2 are very funny people
1 Like
the issues infuriating me most is just the challenger 2 as a whole. theres “accepted” bug reports on the pen values of L27A1 the ready rack the spall liners theres hundreds of them on the armour values the visual model innacuracies etc, and the thing annoying me the most about it is not giving the chally its access to the .50 cal weirdly enough idk why it bothers me so much
7 Likes
God forbid nato/ally nations tanks out perform Russian tanks
4 Likes
in all fairness BMPT aside russias top tier mbt arent that incredible other than relikt bs