Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

brimstone 1s have less then 14km effective range and that is if you are flying high and fast most SAMs would be able to intercept it with relative ease

like giving the brimstone 1 MMV doesnt magically make the missile fly further or faster and again I dont think 18 should be added into the current top tier, 12 AT MOST more then likely 6

1 Like

Would love a “true” RB EC, where all vehicles are allowed for a few reasons.

I’ve tried to do some sim, and well mouse and keyboard do not work for me, but it’s also all I have

But what I really want is true combined arms. Supporting land units off the coasts with ships that get bigger the farther out, or small ships going up the rivers to support those around.

Using arty vehicles as artillery with indirect fire. And other odd weapons(like mortars), on vehicles being able to be added, which don’t work as well with the limited space most maps have.

And of course, all we just talked about.

2 Likes

NO! MiG35 looks better with the tandem seat since the MiG35S doesnt get a different cannopy. Its identical in flight performance and specs as the one with the second pilot behind

Everyone talking mig35 this new su that, but where the honk is my Mig 31

It’s the friends we made along the way, like the MiG-35S
Wait for Russia to get yet another Flanker next update

Everyone talking Mig’s and stuff, where are my Mi-2’s >:( ???

3 Likes

Are there any pictures of the Mig-35S (the single seat)? All I can find is the 2 seater and that thing is ugly

I eated them

nooooooooo


They’re the exact same design wise, however 9.41SR replaces the rear seat with additional electronics.

3 Likes

The matter has already been answered on a similar subject (modern tank armour): [Development] Reports concerning the protection of post-war combat vehicles - News - War Thunder

BTW since you’re here, iirc the Gripen A had its MFDs submitted when the Gripen C was added for the UK, are they still in the work same with the Helmet or have then been skipped?

Resume

Screenshot_20260227-161236
Screenshot_20260227-161156

If there is a report up for the A then thats possible. However I dont know what report we are talking about here without a link.

That’s on me, I thought this had been passed but it wasn’t

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/CUHf92ydOVzp

If this report lacks proper documentation I’ll make a new one, would be quite nice to have the Gripen A corrected

I think you very much found single seater pics and just thought they were all twin seaters, that’s because they share the same large canopy.
Doesn’t look bad tho imo, I kinda like the look

What do these extra electronics do?

Oh I see. Thank you, I’ve been wondering for a few years now XD

better EW/EA suite, better flight controls, just basic stuff nothing too much

Hey, could you please send me the whole video link?

image
just so i can look for myself can i see the published reasoning on the challengers armour if it exists