if it wasnt for it being russian*
This figure is for LoS thickness against a 63° plate. APFSDS performance is significantly exaggerated by testing against heavily angled plates like this, realistically this will put the penetration at around 430-450mm for a flat plate at 2000m. Right in line with vehicles around the 10.3/10.7 area.
1 Like
It’s Slovak 💪💪💪💪💪
1 Like
its on the russian tree though.
Exactly, one day we will free it from those chains though 💪💪💪💪
4 Likes
Problem with Britain getting the full brunt of the commonwealth is the same one as anyone getting Poland, or Poland as a standalone tree.
Or god forbid one of those “Eastern European” TT proposals…
Poland mentioned 💪💪💪💪💪💪
3 Likes
balkan tree unga bunga
You are my favorite poster in these threads. Love your optimism. We’ll see Poland one day for sure.
1 Like
i have a question, what would you do if for some god forsaken reason poland was a russian subtree not that its near a possibility just a what if
This would spark a huge controversy within the Polish playerbase and the rest of the War Thunder playerbase, as it means Russia gets access to a lot of NATO weaponry
4 Likes
No buddy that’s just cope
Pretty much guaranteed for that not to happen considering NATO tech for Russia is fully denied so it should be working vise versa
1 Like
as it means Russia gets access to a lot of NATO weaponry
To be completely fair, it’s not a “lot” at the moment but NATO/Non-CN/RU Nations do already have some access to Russian equipment.
It’s mainly japan but there’s room in the future for more.
Now I’m not saying Russia needs a sub-TT or anything but like, I just don’t get gaijin’s curious standards I suppose.
sounds about right
This isn’t really a special thing, just about all techtrees have it to some extent. It goes the other way around too, for example China is pretty much a 50/50 mix of NATO/RU style tech for most of the techtree from the PRC/ROC split.
Out of all the arguments why Poland shouldn’t be in the USSR tree “NATO tech in USSR tree” is just about the only one I don’t agree with. Not because there’s any need something like this, there isn’t, but because it just doesn’t matter all that much considering how many real militaries both in game and reality use a mix of equipment anyways.
Still, Poland really should get a proper techtree, and there’s more than enough other reasons why them being a USSR subtree is a bad idea.
4 Likes
Still, Poland really should get a proper techtree, and there’s more than enough other reasons why them being a USSR subtree is a bad idea.
Eh I’m still on the side of just not adding Poland in a proper TT/Sub-TT Fashion… It’s just too much for one nation to get imo… ESPECIALLY as a standalone tree, it’d just end up being the top tier metaslop tree more or less, which kinda takes away from other nations which for the time being would still have their own unique niches and the sorts but… idk, it just doesn’t sound good to me… I just don’t wanna deal with anymore TTs for a while, especially ones ridden with copy paste.
:3
1 Like
It’s a 120mm Rifled gun, so nothing super fancy there (120mm SAP and a thermobaric HE round, + HESH)
The armour isn’t bad, but the turret had a massive armour hole for the gunners optic.
Everything else is average.
Probably be 9.7 through 11.0 depending on the exact configuration.
Still, I’d enjoy it for the goofy ammunition alone.
9.7? the mk1 would be 10.0-10.7 and the mk1a would be 11.0-11.3 knowing gaijin