panther II tiger 105 flakpanzer 341 the E100 etc i said event vehicles
E100 has its hull built and is considered a unfinished prototype although the turret is wrong flakpanzer 341 was a woodern mock (still more real then Ostwind 2) and they were removed for not existing
And that’s 3 vehicles out of so many German WW2 tanks most is not the word your looking for
Panther II / Tiger 10.5 / Flakpanzer 341 aren’t event vehicles, they were old tech tree vehicles that were removed. E100 is the only questionable one, but it is an unfinished prototype.

We need the pumas ugly sibling
+All of these vehicles, which were normal TT, were added under different rules. Back then, it was okay for fake stuff.
not my point, my point is the game has a lot of additions that arent completely real and a challenger with a brimstone launcher even if a mockup one would be awesome
yeah thats my mistake i forgot they used to be tt
if you end a TT, the RP that you get after will be stored or gone forever??
Your talking about additions from 10+ years ago where the standard was changed that’s why they all got removed after
Short asnwer, gone
And they’ve moved away from it though. The only questionable vehicles in the last couple years I can think of are because they have the wrong name or are missing something- not nearly as questionable as a 10.5cm Tiger.
Gone, but you still get the usual RP added to your convertible RP pool.
Ostwind 2…
Real, tested on vehicles
Answered about a gazillion times already.
Removed for being unhistorical, so directly counters your own point here about adding another non functional item.
As we have already said, would be considered for removal and replacement if a suitable replacement was found.
Already removed as per the German vehicles for being unhistorical too.
So perhaps don’t then? Since its only you that keeps bringing this vehicle up. You have been directly answered multiple times now.
Hi Smin :)
close enough… :sob:

Don’t worry within another day or 2 they’ll be more cope for chally Street fighter
So many Mods here, could it mean

no
