People really don’t understand variants an it shows.
When pointing out a vehicle claimed built by one nation was built by another, I effectively got told the M4A2 was a C&P of the M4.
…I also got told the Japanese F-2 is a C&P of the F-16
People really don’t understand variants an it shows.
When pointing out a vehicle claimed built by one nation was built by another, I effectively got told the M4A2 was a C&P of the M4.
…I also got told the Japanese F-2 is a C&P of the F-16
Nice
i cant log in does anyone know what this is

i opened it externally and got “authorization error on live”
All I can advise is to please contact support
https://support.gaijin.net/hc/en-us/categories/200005031-War-Thunder
M60 must be copy and paste of the M48/47/46!!

Day 1165 of waiting for Polish tech tree,
i messaged support about a different issue im having with password login and security key requesting and stuff like that
this one however fixed itself
Is that for the Gaijin Market ?
no thats for logging into my account through xbox live and im having continuous issues with it
Nothing I can do sadly would have to wait on feedback from support TBH,
but the other issue is fixed yes?
It’s coming day 1918 trust
If you know, you know 🌚🇵🇱🇵🇱
yeah the other issue fixed itself when i logged in to warthunder through chrome
Yes please more Sabra variants and Merkava MK3D for tech tree.
I’d personally prefer
F4F (Early) 9.3 Only AIM-9B FGW.2 - no Flares
F4B 9.7 Premium, AIM-9B/AIM-7C - No Flares ( Equivalent MIG-21S)
F4C 9.7 AIM-9B/AIM-7C - no Flares ( Equivalent MIG-21F-13)
F4D Early AIM-9E/AIM-7D/AIM-4 10.0 + Flares (semi historical)
F4E Early AIM-9J/AIM-7E 11.0 + Flares
F4D Late AIM-9L/AIM-7F 12.0 + Flares
F4E Late AIM-9L/AIM-7M 12.3 + Flares
not enough magachs
honestly we need more Magachs and Sabras
@Smin1080p_WT
With the “Allied Flag” reward for victory day, where are the Dutch, Canadian and Chinese flags?
The commenwealth forces of Canada had a vital part in the liberation of the Western front of Europe, while the Netherlands and China were crucial forces in Asia. It’s sad that these nations seem to be forgotten all the time.
probably be on-par with F-4C, so 10.0,
even if it isn’t, 9.3 is far too low
Better engines
Lighter
Internal Cannon
Agile Eagle
Resulting in MUCH better flight performance for the cost of
slightly worse IR missiles
No Sparrows (AIM-7D wasn’t amasingly useful anyway)
Maybe for US ones:
I don’t think an early F-4 would sell.
10.0 , F-4C, AIM-7D and AIM-7E, AIM-9B and AIM-9E
10.7 , F-4D, AIM-7E and AIM-7E-2, AIM-9B and AIM-9E
11.3 , F-4E, current iteration
12.3, F-4E Late, AIM-7E-2 and AIM-7F, AIM-9J and AIM-9L
I also checked the ordnance options for F-4D (early, 1967 to 1972). It won’t have TV bombs except Walleye 1. But it can theoretically have the Pave Knife pod and 500 & 2000 lbs Paveway 1 bombs. These bombs are carried in the leftmost and rightmost planes, therefore 2 bombs max. There is also the 3000lb bomb and 750lb bombs but the 750lb one was exclusively used before any guidance pod being developed and I am yet to see an instance of 3000lb paveway being used.
Which should be fine considering you lose 2 AIM-9s to mount the pod (it can be used in the middle pylon I guess but I will search). And CMs pod will occupy the middle pylon or the other AIM-9 pylon, and for the gun it is the same.
And also F-4D in ideal case can have AIM-7E-2 at 10.7, as other radar missiles will have a minimum range of around 4 kms to effectively work and at uptiers you will mostly face MiG-23s. So you might not even be able to climb and shoot your radar missiles effectively.
All I need is Aim-9L for the TT F-4F