Smin while your here can you give me a source that the KH38MT is a real missile that isnt a mockup because im interested after searching for anything realistic for so long
So the KV-1B being the only KV that doesn’t overtier the Finnish lineup isn’t a key tank?
So overtiering the lineup that’s all 4.0 tanks to 4.7 isn’t considered?
KV-1B is only 4.3 while not a huge increase there’s also far more aircraft at 4.3 too rather than 4.0 so why is that not considered a key vehicle?
Sweden has 1 4.0 aircraft and 1 4.7aircraft vs the 6 4.3 aircraft
Talk about personal biases
Again isreal has a 9.3 lineup and not so much a 9.0 so it makes sense but Finland who has 5 4.0 TT ground vehicles and 1 4.3 ground vehicle isn’t considered worth adding their only 4.3 heavy?
@Smin1080p_WT at least answer why the devs don’t see the value in giving Finland their vehicles when Israel benefits from their event vehicles just as much as Finland.
1 Like
We have answered this many times and this is not the place to restart yet another conversation on it which will end up with another multi day off topic spam.
There is sufficient information to show the missile was real. The fact its modern simply means there isn’t much. As was the case for other munitions until recent times. The missile is offered for export too:
Spoiler
this is probably the best the devs will give us
Spawns in
Points towards enemy teams spawn
Ripple fires 8x Brimstones 3
Gets 8x kills
Reloads
:P
Gib )))
I offer 24 JAGM
1 Like
Wide
wasnt looking to talk about it again i just wanted something to see its real but still no combat footage no photo of one IRL that isnt a mockup so i was just unsure is all
Release the BWP variants!
(Those are supposed to be brimstones)
Wishlisting thread is thataway guys >> Next patch and beyond wishlist(Everything except Tech Trees) (Part 2)
This is not the place.
Could you answer my question above? You can’t honestly expect me to just ignore the fact the devs have a clear bias against Finland as they’ve shown time and time again.
Why is uptiering the entire 4.0 lineup to 4.7 where everything gets outclassed considered fine but adding Finlands KV-1B which helps to avoid uptiering your entire lineup by .7 by only .3 while also allowing you to play more of the 4.3 aircraft on the nation.
The entire idea literally makes no sense, it’s just constant Ls to Finland every update and only makes sense if the devs have a personal bias against them.
1 Like
I have answered you personally numerous times on the case of the Finnish KV-1B. No answer has been satisfying for you I appreciate. However I am not going to constantly repeat it over and over, as it has not changed.
the devs have bias against a lot of things (cough cough challenger 2) your not alone
As someone who owns a few old misplaced event vehicles, I don’t think there should ever be a need to keep these exclusive. Their owners still got them significantly earlier and get to keep them for entirely unique lineups so they still retain enough value that a copy can be added to the rightful place.
The Merkava was an amazing decision, I just hope in the future we will see similar treatment for all vehicles like it such as the KV-1B (Finnish) for a much requested one or the Class 3 P (South African) for one that I actually own.
5 Likes
It has changed? You have answered previously that event vehicles like the merkava won’t be added as that would devalue them from their current TT besides that being a very weak point and now the devs have done that with the Merkava so why lie to me again by saying it hasn’t changed when the devs clearly went back on their own words?
So again why is Finland not considered equally as valuable as the Merkava when it comes to being a Key vehicle? Sweden has nothing else that fills that role at 4.3 so again why? Why change the rules for one nation then tell me that things aren’t different?
This isn’t even just the KV-1B it’s all of them, ZA could do with their Class 3P
The devs can’t just make a rule for thee and not for me and expect people to be okay with this
3 Likes
It looks similar yes, but Ive looked it up and it seems the designers used info some from captured German FW-190, which kinda surprised me.
But it’s also like, if multiple parties (be it natural evolution, or development of a vehicle or building or whatever), things are bound to look similar, like the Concorde and Tu-144; 1 goal, 2 seperate parties, similar result.
Simply, there are different rules for the full tech-tree and the sub-tree.
As indicated by comments, that the Greek heli is unlikely to move to its new home.
So:
Independent/full tree: Premium and reward vehicle will join the new home (at some point, with premium moving right away)
Sub-tree: premium and event stuff won’t move and join them.
The KV-1 situation has not changed. If it would have, then we would have updated about it.
The Merkava was a key tank for the Israeli tree.
Should something change for another vehicle in the future, then we would update about that too. But currently there is none. So the answer regarding the KV-1B remains for now.
MB.5 “Stretched Mustang”
CAC-15 “Chubby Mustang”
Just kidding XD