the memes write themselves with TS I swear to god.
They shoulda just said that the marketing department is the ones making the BR changes and it would’ve been a more logical explanation than whatever they spout out in those “comments”
Like i get that the PL-12 as rn is performing to gaijins standard’s but can the bug reporting managers not say obviously false or contradicting things(this has been bugging me for while)? as Medium range missiles do work at shorter ranges and the PL-12 cannot achieve its characteristics at long range either.
Spoiler
3 Likes
Keep in mind that we don’t know if it’s really in metres or if it’s just a unitless modifier number.
2 Likes
Yes, but for example chinese QN506 with FnF missiles treated differently to other FnF armed vehicles.
It has BR of regular autocannon + non FnF missiles. 10.0
Why other autocannon+FnF can’t have same BR?))
Probably mobility if I had to guess. It’s definitely gotta solid firepower going for it but the hull is definitely dated for the BR at 10.0
Gaijin has been repeatedly ignoring my suggestions regarding Challenger 3 (TD)'s balance, and, at this point, I don’t know whether it’s because they are bad or because “according to the stupid statistics this is perfectly fine and makes sense”. What do you think?
3 Likes
Play a line up consisting of R35 and AMC34 YR
I’m not liable for any damage done to your personal computer or any other item nearby while you play
I have lol but if we count one rank as all of low tier France then it makes sense sorta but that’s how most people explained France to me that every single vehicle was bad.
Yes some are bad lol but a good majority is super solid
1 Like
yeah from 3.0 it gets good
until 7.7-8.0
Then it’s just :
Idk the Stuart, AMD pak, and the long boys and the VTT are all super solid 2.x vehicles
oh great. MICA nerf coming soon while the R-77
/R-77-1 remains unchanged 🫤
Like the BRM should atleast be in unity with what they say… or communicate with the CM’s which it doesnt feel like they do.
Spoiler
Chief, is [DEV] Churchill gear update implemented incorrectly on priority either for next update or sooner? I know you rarely touch the ground but playing a Churchill with the early powertrain is actually painful.
Normally I just do suggestions disguised as historical reports, but this is an actual bug affecting 6 vehicles due to the incorrect implementation of the rpm & gears.
I’d encourage anyone to take a test drive and try to get over 13 km/h without downhill assist.
That’s a lot worse then… I guess the only way to know is to compare it to other (presumed correct) missiles then, which is more of a problem.
Doesn’t really matter when it’s impossible to report anyways though. I wish Gaijin could give input on what the numbers represent, if/how they’re simplified compared and give a way to officially access them in game for reports, it would probably only help them on their way to a more accurate game.
Then again it’s also resources they don’t get paid for, so I doubt this will happen anytime soon.
if you compare it to other missiles youll get a headache btw, as those values are chosen per preferance to achieve wanted performance
1 Like
I just think it’s… interesting how we as players are saying with video proof that you can roll or pull hard to evade the PL-12/A that’s designed to hit ~9-12 g manoeuvring targets in a state where it has the most energy possible, ie during or immediately after the rocket motor burns out.
“Medium range missiles aren’t supposed to work close range”… lol
So good to be a France main, don’t have to deal with such nonsense when your missile has thrust vectoring 🤣
i personally think they should revert the engine power nerf and buff the ROF because the nerf was really stupid in the first place
1 Like
can someone tell me what were the actual changes with the new BR list because im struggling to find anything different from the previous
Ah, but see, the CR3TD is far more OP than the M1A1 HC, M1A1 Clickbait or M1A2 as it has DM53 L/55 and so would be unfair if it got a buff /s
Yak-3 maybe?
Other than that, yeah, Ive got nothing
(the “new” link and the one at the top of the thread are the same link)