You mean the F-4J(UnK)
Yeah, they really should just rename it that these days
Yeah there a lot of questionable vehicles at weird BR’s
That pool will grow a little next update
Also wth the F4S is going to 10.7 in ground what the hell am I supposed to do against that in the F-35?
At this point im convinced that 95% of the BR changes are just done via lucky draw.
The put all vehicles into a giant bowl, and just randomly pull out 2-3 dozen and then make changes to those ones. then they just pick 2-3 community suggested changes as “feedback” and that is the BR changes we get
2 Likes
and the Hawk 200 RDA is too OP to be 10.7 due to its Skyflash DFs
1 Like
in realistic it’s the right way around, but asb brs seem pretty screwed up
yeah, exactly, if you throw the Hunter F1 into the mix as well. The F1 (weaker engine, weaker wing and no AAMs) being the same BR as the F6 is really really dumb. At least the J34 and F1 would be kinematically similar
1 Like
Yeah idk, ground air BR is super compressed and it’s insane
I is sad now :'(
If I don’t spell it correctly I’ll be attacked.
Also I’ll never understand why so many French players diss on the early game for France (minus CA Lorraine post nerf, that thing is actually hot trash)
Also EBR 1951 is good but it should be like 4.3 imo
No chanages to the loadout. It would be noted.
1 Like
Idk, I’m only an air player but ranks 5-6 and the 10.0s were a lovely experience for me
They need to move the new 2.3 Fokker up with the 13.2s and nerf the ammo belts to their IRL values idk why they changed it after the devblog with its correct ammo count was stated then they buffed it to 1000 rounds. It’s better than the other 2.3 13.2 user by miles.
Outside of that the GIA is absolutely peak for aircraft, I still kept that and the biplane with the 20mm on my lineup until 7.7 because I could still send noobs back to the hanger
1 Like
Really not looking forward to defending against Mig-29s in the Tornado GR4. I thought with the addition of a 12.3 bracket I could finally actually enjoy that aircraft… and now its been undone
1 Like
When Gaijin finally adds the Mirage NG I’ll be interested in top tier air. Personally the Rafale is meh for me.
1 Like
The only Fr#nch aircraft that would interest me at the moment is the Mirage IV
1 Like
So for the Manpads you adjusted their performance down compared to the 9m39, even though official manufacteurer brochures say they are more capable? With just the way a missile looks from the outside?
But for the Pl-12 you can adjust performance down with (seemingly) no basis and then deny all reports by saying it can’t be compared to other fox 3 missiles?Because its a medium range missile with higher overload than an aim120 and still turn way worse? But all the manpads and 9m39 get treated the same? Will this treatment be extended to apfsds and ERA?
There seems to be an official guideline missing that you follow regarding the game, if historical accuracy is more important or balancing tech given the arbitary documentation on everything modern and it’s hurting expectations of what will be adjusted to be inline with maybe subpar, old tech to keep balance and what modern tech will be adjusted randomly to be outright worse than others?
Now that the pl12 is so much worse can we atleast expect the pl15? Or of the devs to roll back the guidance change till they fix the issues?
11 Likes
Eh, I’m just not a fan of how it looks, Fr🤮nce peaked with the Mirage III