Considering the person being talked to, I’d believe it. They seem to want the worst/most controversial placements possible (ex. current event show, it shouldn’t be done like that). To the point, being C&P or being two nations that didn’t need to be mixed into one tree seems like non-issues in comparison.
2 Likes
But they also did say it’s not intended to be a subtree specifically. I think this does mean they have specific plans for Czech vehicles.
And personally I think Poland/Czechoslovakia compared to other techtree proposals stands out as one of the most interesting and functional ones out there.
It has two (three if modern Slovakia is counted separately) nations, which is significantly less than something like a LATAM or Arab League proposal and more in line with what’s already in game. There’s both unique vehicles and functional lineups throughout. The game is popular in these nations.
I also remember a Polish interview where they said there could be a Polish tree at some point, but I’m not fully sure I remember it right.
4 Likes
InTeRwAr pLaNeS rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeee
Wasn’t the techtree version of the Fokker also added after the release?
See that’s the thing I’m actually somewhat hoping is a clue that Poland will get it’s own tree is we haven’t seen the Rosomak. If gaijin wanted to really mess up the Polish tree they could’ve added it already but they haven’t.
Actually Britain got the Patria added to the TT before a Finnish version did given theirs is locked to an event lol.
2 Likes
France was in Britain, Italy was in Germany. This is not uncommon.
Unless the placement of a nation is confirmed to be fixed (techtree/subtree) anything goes that might be profitable.
5 Likes
Yeah I was just answering where they were first
1 Like
Ah, well at least there’s that. Still a really sad line especially with the massive gap that has enough space for the one domestic Finnish plane that wasn’t a premium already.
Spoiler
Third time in the past 10min or so…
3 Likes
The fact that Finland has such good potential but Gaijin barely utilises it.
3 Likes
Indeed, Poland and Czechoslovakia can be visible unique.
As much as I want by CAN-ANZAC tree, which heavily limits C&P compared to unique/domestic stuff and fills capablity gaps but it suffers from its heavy use of a licensed built(and as seen by the Canadair NF-5A “boo! US C&P” despite being a sub-variant of a variant not yet in game, which was also not built by the US) or as seen with the Canadian LAV famly and US mains constent claim it’s domestic to the USA even tho they don’t do anything more then use two of the later varints.
5 Likes
Credit where it’s due, this is something they’re insanely skilled at
4 Likes
It’s hilarious they still have to have the J34 a swedish used Hunter in the Finnish air line cause they were too lazy to add literally anything else.
3 Likes
Honestly that techtree at least seems like the best option the game has for the Australia/Canada situation no matter what.
The alternatives are either keeping them in the current split hell, or an additional two full subtrees to Britain while the current two don’t even have enough space (I’d argue even Britain alone doesn’t). Then even with the space issue fixed that’s still not only the most nations any techtree would have in game at five, but also ones that individually have a lot of content, so the balance with other nations would also need to be considered again.
6 Likes
Honestly idk where the Humu would sit.
The B-239 is like a baby Ki-44, terrible climb and overall speed but a worse turn fighter than most Japanese props but with better guns. Basically a worse turning Japanese plane with no roll whatsoever but great guns.
Humu is a B-239 with 2 less guns and like 1200hp engine over the 850 the B-239 has
1 Like
So worse armament but better performance? Slightly higher then, 3.0-3.3 maybe depending on how much of a performance difference there is?
Real nice servers tonight, only kicked 5 times, a new all time low of kicks :D
Jesus christ… connection lsot for everyone in my lobby every other minute
After the Nuclear Thunder event, AI’s can now shoot down munitions in all modes. Why wasn’t this mentioned in any changelogs? Will it be tuned down in the future? In Air SIM airfields are now near untouchable, SAMs are able to intercept even incoming AAMs. This surely is a bug caused by the improper implementation of the mechanism for the purpose of the event.
Air Simulator Battles Air Defences now able to intecept munition
1 Like
Nothing for ANZAC Day today? The Aussies didn’t even get an Australia day sale this year.
well id say more or less that the best possible one would be the block 70s, not the F-16E due to them being based off a block 60 standard, if the US were to get the best possible than it would be more like the theorized block 80 version, which would be a block 70 but with American infostructure and different cockpit mounts, and some kind of Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System, so it would end up being the same kind of deal as the F-16AJ, of which also doesn’t exist outside of pamphlet
however its not to say that its not possible for the US to get a block 70 as there has been a few test squadrons that have flown them as well as images of block 70s with US tail markings
or through a possible Turkish subtree (I say turkey due to the M60AMBT being Turkish and in the US tech tree as event vehicle) but as of now is just later and later portions of the PoBIT program