Can someone make a suggestion for that veteran thingy‽‽
1 Like
Anyone can, Although it’s best to get permission from the author of the camos as credit.
There’s not been any previously suggested what comes close to those ones as far as i can find. Atleast regarding veterancy. Some ‘Netting camo’s’ Have been passed to devs previously.
4 Likes
Those veteran camos by NORYQ are cool as hell! I think for low-mid tier it might have to look a bit different on certain camos as to not look like a dead tank.
3 Likes
can someone please tell me why the russian turret baskets aren’t a thing yet? they should’ve been added with the leclerc’s baskets last update but for some reason they still use a non-existent wireless turret basket that holds the autoloader in thin air
People on reddit say, T-90M does not have turret baskets irl
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/1rj8sb1/dev_type_10_leclerc_turret_basket_vs_t90m/
So maybe it actual does not have it IRL
2 Likes
Are we getting next season of battle pass dev blog today?
Dont think so. Probably next week, one day before release.
Cant wait for the Indonesian BTR-4M to be finally added to the Japanese TT!!
3 Likes
Yeah double checked and the don’t, autoloader is on rollers. Although non modern tanks don’t have an APU like the 90M and just rely on hydraulics so turret traverse should almost immediately stop being fast and should be as slow as it is normally when battery reaches 0 like now
Even with that logic, than a hit into the autoloader should block the turret from rotation, yet thats also not Modelled…
1 Like
But why? If both autoloader and turret have different turret drive, then why should hitting the autoloader block turret rotation?
that is one benefit of the challenger 2s they will never have a turret basket problem (instead they just blow up because of the charges in the hull)
1 Like
4 Likes
i am quiet dissapointed with the F-6C being an Event, just like the F-100F.
Why couldn’t both these vehicles be implemented in the Chinese TT instead of as an Event.
The J-6 and F-100A are just C&P vehicles inside an already major C&P populated environment, so these could have been Event.
Having the F-6C and F-100F inside the TT would have made much more sence in the sence of uniqueness wise.
What do you think?
1 Like
The BMPT is finally going up, yet still no 12.3
1 Like
People consistently request event vehicles be more unique rather than purely existing vehicles. Or to have unique features or be unique variants.
A different set of people think that unique vehciles shouldnt be events at all.
In that vien, sadly you wont ever please anyone. So its why we have a mix of everything.
2 Likes
Best thing Ive heard in a while.
Yes please!!!
That would be very nice!:)
Yes, and it adds so much more depth and personality to tanks! Like imagine if there could be even more/personal customization when u reach like idk “Veterancy master level” or sum. Peak update if they would make it a feature
At least challengers would die instantly, instead of getting disabled and watch the enemy reload (while regretting some choices that lead to this situation) before getting killed
The trick is probably to make them both unique and incredibly niche/useless, things that are funni in the game but don’t have their place in the tree
While that’s also true, the current state of the Chinese aviation until Rank VII is mostly copy and paste.
And in the last few years we havent seen anything unique being added in the Chinese TT untill Rank VII (with the exception of the JH-7 which was added 2 updates ago).
The last unique aircraft for the TT was the V-12, which was added in update 2.11 “Ground Breaking” which was released on 28 October 2021.
Are there any plans for the near future to make the Chinese air tree more attractive for Rank VII and below? Since now, it doesn’t offer anything Chinese, Pakistani or Bangladeshi.
EDIT, not the V-12 it’s the La-11 which was added in Update “Winged Lions” on 14 December 2021.