Wouldn’t spawning such vehicles on airfields solve this issue?
IIRC they’re roughly that distance from the ground map (on bigger maps anyway)
Wouldn’t spawning such vehicles on airfields solve this issue?
IIRC they’re roughly that distance from the ground map (on bigger maps anyway)
And I am shocked that there arent even Suggestions for them
And how do you wanna hit something from 15km away without LOS?
I mean you can already hit stuff in game without LOS
It’s just artillery but rocket after all
i’m just saying, now that we have articulating vehicles in game, there’s nothing stopping this beut from entering the battlefield
@Smin1080p_WT what are the chances that the devs agree to it?
Because all Models in game have them allready, they are just hidden
It’s literally just a T-62 hull from 8.3, no composite or ERA just normal steel armor
@Smin1080p_WT is there any news on the SM-SV Pantsir being nerfed into the ground? getting sick and tired of the 50km 0 RWR/MAW shots from that clearly non-historically accurate thing.
It does not trigger your rwr/maw?
Mine usually neither as well.
It has that search boxy thingy which doesnt lock you, but you can see the enemy plane surrounded by a box.
That would be IRST
Although MAW not triggering is a happy coincidence
both shit
IRST? It has IRST?
who cares
Gnat would be one of the better gunfighters for it BR. I beleive its nickname was the Sabre Slayer
Jaguar GR3A would just be interesting, way more interesting than a C&P soviet thing. Maybe not the meta, maybe not even all that strong, but I would play it quite a bit in something like ASB
gnat maybe
but gr3a ,no;it has no advantage at all. just a terrible thing
Hi Smin :3
Hi Dontkev, why dont i get a high? Hè!?
Because sonehow my WT Launcher just died… cant select between Live/Dev/Dev Stable :(
But, High :)
Respectfully we are more than happy to chase any reports, provide any status updates and communicate any answers we have from the devs on them. We simply ask if you are asking for an update to a specific report(s), you provide the links to the report in question. Since we are tagged and asked about reports all the time every day.
I or anyone else on the team however do not have a photographic memory of every individual bug report ever made and can find and recall them every time we are asked. That is not “my job” to find the the specific links for a list of issues that anyone can simply list off every time we are asked as such anywhere.
As mentioned, we are more than happy to help, we just ask that if you are requesting status updates or report chasing, you simply provide the links to the specific reports you are asking for. That way, I can see the whole history of the report in question and any connecting internal reports it may have.
Im well aware of this report, however you did not just list the M735 issue. You listed several entirely different issues you requested updates for. Not just this one. Some of which I am not familiar with the specific reports no. Hence why I asked for the links.
Regarding M735, the report has just been nudged again. There’s currently no update to provide on it currently. It remains open under investigation.