They should just finally add the Challenger 1 Falcon to the tec tree. Idk which gaps it would be filling but I want it nevertheless.
3 Likes
The same one that the Arjun would apparently fill. But would be waaaay better
i think gaijin instead of adding another 10.7 mbt that we dont need as britain has imo the strongest 10.7 lineup in the game they need to
1: add an spaa for the 7.3-7.7 br
2: implement the many accepted bug reports for the challengers to make them competitive
3: fix the cheiftain mk10 as it went up to 9.3 for some reason
4: give britain and ifv for the 11.0-11.3 range (please blackjax)
5: add APHE to the british 75mm (this is historically acurate i believe)
6: Spear 3 or fnf brimstones (i beg)
7: cr2 streetfighter (personal request)
i think this would be amazing
i garuntee they would make it an event vehicle or a premium
oh 100%. The chances of this being a regular tec tree vehicle are extremely low
Yep, that would be the most sensible course of action
More than likely would just be a CR2 with a dozer-blade so I just want Dozer blades for most/all current CR2s
It should have been the 10.7 SQV over the T-90
i meant the streetfighter 2 just because an mbt with a brimstone on top would be fucking awesome i dont care if it was only a mockup (am i allowed to swear on forums idk)
Yeah, but it likely wouldnt do anything and I would be kinda annoyed to grind out an entirely new CR2 just for a dozer blade
it also has a .50cal (like every other cr2 also should) and im pretty sure the side armour is supposed to be slightly better but i just want it for the “hell yeah” factor
Also gaijin has said they don’t want to add KH-38s to premiums, when it was bug reported for the MKK and MK2
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
why would it be 12.0? its an ags style turret but on a bigger slower chassis
STOP SAYING THAT!!!
You are also forgetting that the AGS is stuck with M833, which is a 9.0 round.
Lets summarize what we have with the Falcon, gathered mostly from the suggestion:
- Possibility of firing rounds like KE-W (also the round Gaijin would likely give it, which is already better than almost any of the 11.7-12.7 Challengers.
- 4.5-5 second reload for the first 2-3 rounds, 7.5 second reload. (similar to the existing CR2s)
- CR1 hull means it’s lighter and thus more mobile than the CR2s in game. Hell The smaller turret and reduced need for a lot of heavy composite on said turret means that it should be even lighter than the CR1.
- Crewless turret, which have shown to be extremely potent in WT.
So compared to the CR2, which is 11.7, the Falcon trades a little bit of hull armor for better mobility, sidegrade firepower and much much much better survivability.
I would love to know what kind of weight reductions they achieved with the Falcon turret on the Chally 1 compared to the normal Chally 1.
I would rather have the new Challenger 3 with EPSOM than a CR2 with dozer blade, ngl
2 Likes
oh wow. i need to do my research that would probably make it 12.3-12.7 then considering it sounds not much worse than a black night or a cr2E
1 Like
i want a cr2 with a brimstone launcher because “hell yeah” the EPSOM would be nice though
But it was long ago deemed by the devs that the brimstone launcher was a mockup and not functional thus not eligible for ingame implementation, sooo
Also, would that launcher even be effective anyway if implemented, or would it just be a reskinned gambling missile like the Spikes?
And EVEN if the missiles were good, it carried only two, so… I don’t know hahah
