To an extent. Gaijin just uses too little common sense, they need to learn the art of balance. Gaijin opted to treat War Thunder as more of a cash grab rather than a long term investment.
2 Likes
Ground? Nah there didn’t bother with them at all, the panzer IV and t34 were the only useful additions since they filled gaps the rest just padded out pre existing lineups rather than fixing holes.
They also ignored anything unique in favor of low effort slop
I didnt say they bothered with unique stuff, and overall the finnish ground subtree is insanely good
Sure good but slop at doing a good job at representation of the nation and filling gaps, so instant F tier
Im a bit busy so ill sum my thought. They couldve filled much needed gaps with unique equipment which would’ve better represented the fins while not taking away from others.
Sweden didn’t need a 2A6 it shouldve been a unique Patria no, that became an event vehicle for money. Sweden needs a good 9.7 given they lack a good 9.3 SPAA and the T72 finmod couldve done that.
Why add a T54 when the 7.7 lineup needs more attention thats where the 155GH52-SP-T55 comes in, how about a 4.x lineup since sweden basically only has light armor TD’s couldve added the Sturmi ect ect.
If your idea of good is what Finland is, i hope you never get to a position where we need to take advice from you with subtrees.
Gaijins arch nemesis. They only develop what will bring in quick cash, rather than what will bring in more players.
1 Like
With how much Gaijin tries to not add new BRs. Do you guys think they’re going to add Meteor and AIM-9X and AAM-4B and other end-of-line missiles at 14.7?
Multi vehicle AA overall would be useless there.
At least from the north, i can see AA finding their way in the south.
EldE would just do what it does best, drive in place.
you could try to hide your Launchers behind the wall and have the Radar be a little further up
Think they’ll ever add a more pathetic AA than the Elde?
its called dude with an AK
1 Like
The only thing I can think about off the top of my head, would be the skyguard.
Worse missiles, and the same problem as elde, but on wheels this time
1 Like
Hello @Smin1080p_WT , are there plans to further improve the LERX visual effects? Or are devs satisfied with the current implementation?
I really think they could look much more realistic than this.
2 Likes
Guy with AK can actually kill other SPAA so that still beats Elde
You want them to put actual effort into something or what?
1 Like
Hate to say it but the Piaggio ape from Denmark would be a better vehicle than the elde
Let’s just say that after playing some battlefield 6 I just can’t look at WT LERX effects the same, it almost feels like they are not there.
Well, currently LERX in WT look like they’re just always there and only get regulated in visibility from 0 to 100% according to speed and AoA. So the cheapest of the cheapest possible way to implement them. And they’re only at the leading edge corners, no negative pressure condensation on the wing surfaces, etc.
1 Like
I wonder if they add Caproni Ca.135bis in the 5th line or in the bombers line.
Italy has so many bombers from that era to add that imo it would be wiser to place some in the 5th line, especially if they were used by subnations (Ca.135bis, SM.79B/JRS.79).
2 Likes
Better visuals and added to more aircraft too. Looking at what we got vs what it should look like is a night and day difference.
Hell we barely even got that what they shown in the CM Disclosure.
5 Likes
I mean it’s better than nothing but it could look way better indeed