Keep in mind the AH-60 Battlehawk ingame is not a UH-60 used by the IAF, it won’t get those systems they have and only the ones it got IRL. The one we have ingame is a modified variant from Elbit(?) that acted as a demonstrator for Colombia’s AH-60Ls. IAF Blackhawks are not used for combat purposes, this was a one off demonstrator for export purposes.
gaijin cuando llegaran mas vehiculos de alemania oriental , el shilka zsu 23-4v , el zsu 57 , el strela 1 , el t55AM2B que es similar al t55amd, el bmp 2, pt76b , la serie 2s1 y 2s3 , t54amz , los is2m el brdm2 pero con misiles anti tanque , son tanques que el darian u n complemento mas a la alemania oriental , vehiculos completos
That literally makes any radars useless, specially in squadron battles, it makes everything easier for ground.
Actually I wouldn’t care if squadron battles weren’t copy/paste of ground battles
Why you think F-14 IR would get a missile update?
No, it would be blatantly OP and pay to win at 12.7, especially since there are several worse planes at 13.0.
It could go down if it lost AAM-3s, but do you want that?
1 Like
Find which one doesn’t have an all aspect IR missile and you find your answer.
Does the F-2 even have anything but the AAM-3 for an IR missile?
Also JAS-39A should be moved to 12.3 for ground battles, because it literally has everything much better for the same 12.0 BR concurrents.
It’s specially cancer for Squadron battles, because it’s like at 12.0, 4 grippens = win, that’s really disgusting.
Only one jet on it’s BR that is better in everything than others
Hi Smin, writing with the best intentions but i feel compelled by God himself to ask. Why? I understand not giving the fulcrum the R-73 has been a balancing decision by the development team. However the Yak-141 is receiving the R-73 now and will now have a more capable missile kit with R-73’s to use in its VTOL mode and HMD for incredible shots while the MiG-29 still has the R-60m at the same BR. Has there been any reason to deny the Fulcrum its missile for so long now that its younger prototype brother is acquiring it?
5 Likes
If it doesn’t have them, that doesn’t mean it should get them.
Actually I don’t care about that F-14, but short period buff for it would be nice, that would help me sell my second F-14 for a higher price
Maybe next time we get 11.3.
4 Likes
Add this as a fun Russian SPAA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9c4aEpnmxg
The Gibka-S.
Not busted because Verbas are already in the game on the Mi-8AMTSh-VN.
@Smin1080p_WT Quick question, what’s an f16 doing at the same br as my ej kai lol… Were they doing that badly? I dont look forward to seeing an f16 in my F-104s with 7es and 9js.
3 Likes
Would be cool to include some volunteers players into balancing team, but people who play all nations and aren’t biased towards any or at least not as biased as naval developers.
1 Like
What if I tell you that volunteering is one of the main issues of the bug report system being unable to forward fixes and documentation to developers in due time?
In theory, volunteering sounds wonderful as people do it on labor of love. In practice, their own motivations work as their revenue.
You must hire technically capable people with a proper payroll to bring arbitrary results.
2 Likes
Hi, @Smin1080p_WT What about the linear T-72B3A(12.3 br)
You forgot to lower the br to 12.0 for the T-72b3a tank.Linear b3 was reduced to 11.3, marathon b3a to 11.0, so why did b3a (linear) remain at 12.3?
Because it shouldn’t get anything new due to logical reasons “it’s the only one that doesn’t have all aspect missiles” is not an argument.
It has Fakur-90 which are somehow, somewhy better then Phoenix missiles, but whatever and that would be enough for F-14 IR
1 Like
any real news on the patch yet?