Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Game Discussion General Discussion
9042

Excuse me Sir Smin, but with the F-16I Sufa going up to 13.0 in ground RB alongside the Gripen E, is there any chance it can be considered to finally get its 16x Spice-250 loadout it’s still missing?

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8xuIvuXlfa84
(64 updoots as of now)

The Gripen E has this exact loadout at the same BR as of now, meaning there should be no balance issues to speak of as gaijin seems to see it, and it would bring them on par with one another. Just hoping it hasn’t been forgotten, with it finally going up there I had expected this change really and would be quite sad to see it without them. Whatever the case, again just hoping it hasn’t been forgotten or anything.

5 Likes
9043

Why is naval feedback always skipped?

9044

Yeah that too… Though the feedback is usually “please nerf the soviets” so of course it wont be listened too

2 Likes
9045

Hey. This would not be connected to BR changes. But a separate consideration, likely for major updates.

9046

Loadout changes often occur as part of BR changes to allow for a vehicle to move BRs. Like how the Falcons are loosing APDS (though no corrective BR change to compensate)

5 Likes
9047

Could we expect further Chieftain Changes?

At 9.3 they would be wholly inferior to T-72A/M and ZTZ96, and could easily be buffed to be onpar with them at their new BR

L23A1

Correct the Mk.10’s Horsepower (main report)

Reduce their reload

10 Likes
9048

Not in terms of jet BRs and new bomb ordinance. This is an entirely different matter for tanks, in which shells are a primary balance means.

9049

Seriously I don’t remember a single time, when any naval changes were added based on feedback, not even talking about in general almost zero changes each time.

9050

These changes are not tied to the BR changes tomorrow, which are being done based on the Chieftains current in game performance.

Naturally its possible these changes could occur at a later stage, but they are not part of the BR update.

9051

Yeah… Though they are notably nerfing Britains already, difficult, top tier bluewater.

Im just annoyed they ignored my HMS Tiger post. should never have gone up in the first place and its only been nerfed since then

9052

When is the F-14 IR missile update planned Smin?

1 Like
9053

Damn, can’t believe the BR of the AMX30 S DCA hasn’t been adjusted. Surely the people in charge of those BR changes aren’t that much blinded by the statistic to be able to see that the AMX is worse in every, and I mean every single way to the Gepard and still sits at a higher BR now.
Removing the APDS belts of the 30mm was just covering up for the main users of the 35mm vehicles which has always been much more of a problem

4 Likes
9054

Smin, may I ask is the 12.7 for the Tigers all?
Specially the UHT/HAC are looking realy sad + on top ALL Tigers are missing HIRSS
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/3eH60xwffiTV

9055

As per feedback requests yes, they are going down.

This type of change would not be tied to BR changes.

9056

I assume thr outer pylon PARS are still on the Devs table for Review?

9057

So wait another 6-8 months for a new BR changes thread to suggest this…

got it…

9058

Yes, this is something under consideration. But not part of these current BR changes.

9059

hopefully

9060

Can we speak allready in SOON as in maybe this year or not worth it?

9061

They are also still missing their HMS for their air to air missiles (at the very least the mistrals). Devs even marked a report for it as fixed when it was in fact, not fixed. A new report was made on top but is now rotting in the depth of the bug report system.
Literally just a 1 line of code change from false to true

1 Like