Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

image
Gaijin - “YOU GET A SU-30, YOU GET A SU-30, EVERYONE GETS A SU-30!!!”

3 Likes

I mean,

image

4 Likes

Gaijin has an opportunity to do the funniest thing and just make either a Su-30 only sub tree or an update solely for adding Su-30’s for everyone.

1 Like

@Smin1080p_WT

can the mig 29 9.12 finally get R73s since the F15A with AIM-9Ms is gonna be 12.7 ?

4 Likes

with how op KH-38MTs are cause there rapid speed makes them hard to shoot down compared to a maverick id say everyone should get a SU30

especially since the SM2 is basically unbeatble right now and can even dunk on the rafale

F-15As should NOT be going to 12.7 with Aim-9Ms honestly, no clue what gaijin is on. (I know for a fact the Israeli F-15A “Baz” didn’t even use 9Ms, so it could go to 12.7 after having them removed, but no F-15 with 9Ms belongs there.)

1 Like

its due to the match maker F15A is just not capable of coping with FOX-3s like a Su27 or SU33 can its a dogfighter forced to do BVR with the WORST FOX-1s of the br

An issue of horrible compression. Doesn’t mean it should go down and massacre the vehicles below it.

1 Like

i know im just saying thats why its stats dropped so gaijin drops it

1 Like

F-15J is even more devious with the AAM-3s

2 Likes

Things gonna be a monster man… surely they won’t go through with it… right?

And now no reason not to add AAM-3 to the F-4EJ Kai since it’s the same BR the F-15J will be

1 Like

ther would still be a 0.3 diffrence. EJ KAI is 12.3

1 Like

Its amazing that gaijin manages to raise the BR yet still find a way to add even more BR compression. Whatever i guess i will enjoy the 12.7 F-15J for however long thats allowed to happen if it happens.

1 Like

4.1kg of pancakes and maple syrup

7 Likes

CM update next week or after that week?

Last year’s community update for March update happened on Feb. 18 so not anytime soon it seems.

Yeah you must be right its too early

Yes your right sorry I don’t know why I thought it was 12.7

  • The american & british tech tree on researchable vehicle rank II lack the early night fighter (BR same Do 217N-2).

    but inferior to P-61A-11, Mosquito F Mk II, Mosquito NF Mk II, J30 and Whirlwind Mk I

  • Lack P-51C early block and P-51B

  • None entry-level 1st gen fighter aircraft from RAF and USAAF on researchable tree rank IV (battle rating 5.7 ~ 6.3)

  • USA tech tree lack night fighter variant of F4U, P-38, F-82, F7F and F8F

  • UK tech tree none de Havilland Hornet NF variant

  • The early 1st gen fighter aircraft turbojet engine from USAAF (6.3 ~ 6.7) and USN (6.7 ~ 7.0)

  • The early 1st gen fighter aircraft turbojet engine from RAF (6.7 ~ 7.0)

  • None USAF aircraft turbojet engine (battle rating 7.3)

1 Like