May i ask what the case with BOL is because doing a fair amount with sweden i have some sources on it
Bol went from a chaff only launcher that at first produced the chaff strips used in the KB Pod found on the AJ37, a smaller more efficient chaff was developed into the 90s and at the dawn of the 2000s the BOL IR was developed
If you have any issues with the chaff then that is likely the reason, the fact it originally used Large Chaff strips as opposed to the more effective smaller chaff
As for IR to my knowledge only the one from Chemring has been fully developed so there should be little issues as to the BOL IR capabilities
Now ive no clue when the Large Chaff was swapped out for the other chaff but it was prior to the introduction of the Typhoon and JAS39C just maybe not the Shar or JA37
I think you do not understand the difference.
Here is how a example of a internal belt looks like
And here is how a external belt looks
You should see it by now, they are entierly different.
the atgms would probably rip apart the turret and perforate the ammo when they detonate
the hull 30mm stowage has nowwhere to go when it detonates as either the tank has 0 mine resistance, less than a fiat 500 even, and the explosion is entirely directed to below the tank and probably burning away rubber as it does so making the tracks useless if theyre rubber but it’d look sick as hell.
or the ammunition has nowhere to go but everywhere so into the crew
I hope whatever br changes they do arent done till the new year because i am really enjoying playing 9.0 with near constant downtiers or at worse at tier battles.
I mean diesel in fairness i think has an ever so slightly lower chance of going boom than basic petrol due to the nature of it
but it also must combust at some point soooooooo
idk, im no expert on diesel and petrol but there is a mild amount of logic to it
