It’s advertised for Su-30MK models, but that’s about it. That said, still more proof than the MKI derivatives like the SM/SM2/MKM are, which Gaijin insists to keep.
Also China needs better CAS, and this would be the exact same situation as the Su-30MKM which also filled a CAS gap with a weapon newer than it that was never used by Malaysia.
yeah, its similar dog water reasoning with the underperforming r-73 max lateral g load. Plenty of primary sources pinning it at 60gs, and even declassified uk evaluations putting the single plane lateral acceleration at 45gs, yet in game it is only 40gs cause why not, then reports on it are sitting on accepted for 2 years
Personally I think Gaijin will probably want more nations to get it, so I’d expect to see an Su-30MKI for India and Su-30MK2 for China with it sometime next year.
they wasted the paintball theme too, there’s a APC conversion with Fox turrets which is used for tank vs tank paintball in the UK, but no, T-72 instead lmao
Gaijin has been skipping working on important features and mechanics for way too long and I’ve got a feeling that they won’t be working on those features and mechanics anytime soon
They just cannot be bothered to rework ARB to accomodate proper 4th gen (or 5th gen) gameplay
Spoiler
and instead of putting additional resources into doing that necessary work, they decided to hire people to work on infantry