we must not question this too much because it quickly can be seen as Politics Which is banned here
people like Manfred von Richthofen and Oswald Boelcke would actually fit tho, although they’d represent an Era that’s not normally in tbe game, which is probably why they aren’t being represented
yes and in game they could tok have a tree
As a safety net probably could just block off late 1920’s to mid 1955 just to avoid the obvious but should still check people just incase but I wouldn’t see any harm in having pre/post axis nation pages of history. But yeah if we did have WW1 then Richthofen and Boelcke would be perfect for pages of history along with people like Max Immelmann, Erwin Böhme, and Werner Voss all of which were hugely influential in the initial development of aerial combat whose teachings and tactics can still be found in today’s air combat tactics.
Although not a pages of history we do still have some Axis pilots in-game, Norbert Flegels Bf-109 as an example is based on his aircraft he flew during the Spanish Civil War as part of the Condor Legion but he did later join Luftwaffe and fight during WW2.
But in my honest opinion if they genuinely did something heroic and obviously wasn’t a bad person then I personally see no issue with it. Best example of what I mean would be Franz Stigler who risked his own life to save a B-17 crew, he was adamantly against the ideals of his nation and fought out of duty to his country not it’s leader. People like that would be fine but I can see why Gaijin would rather, for the sake of PoH, just omit Germany, Japan, Italy, Finland and Hungary all together.
I mean Gaijin is not short of controversies and they generally, like many companies would rather play safe and omit anything risky.
I’d just quote myself:
what other upgrades did it get besides AESA radar?
better avionics
i think it has 360° rwr
and like i told you in a different thread, the possiblity to get a MAW
and also upgraded engines, i think (not too sure on that one tho)
Just to confirm, we’re talking about F-15SG and not F-15SA right? F-15SG was what was leaked for Israel.
It seems F-15SG is just F-15E with AESA radar, so not even a changed RWR or engines compared to F-15E in-game?
SG seems to still have the old F-15C engines
so it seems more like it is an upgraded F-15D or early F-15E, so ingame it probably gonna end up as another F-15 GE
So even worse?
seems like it has MAWs and more CMs after all
so slightly better than the F-15C GE
but worse than the F-15EX
Okay I know the thread states it has MAWS but I looked further into it, doesn’t appear so.
Fact Sheet: F-15SG | Ministry of Defence
This lacks any inclusion of MAWS on it, and I went over the airframe of the F-15SG.
@WreckingAres283 could you provide clarity please?
Do I’ve to do everyones homework now?
Interesting, I was expecting to see it at the top of the rudders, so is it just rear aspect?
Yea - Unless there is some PD based MAWS somewhere integrated as well, but thanks to Singapore’s great OPSEC, we will probly never really know.
So basically the same as the ex if i am not wrong, but what to they mean by “old f15c engine”? I don’t remember any f15c having ge 129 (i just confuse)
We’re just speculating and bordering on near misinformation, so just take these conversations with a grain of salt.
