During these 2 years other pictures had beeen provided to show that at least the hull armor is incorrect.
One of them is the direct comparison between the in game model and a top down photo from CIO of the Ariete.
The red marks shows different weld lines that hint to a quite different armor layout compared to the model in game ( bigger plates and possibly the composite screen in the middle gap ).
We can’t provide data as it would be illegal, but why is this still not considered as “enough info”? ( at least for the hull )
Why doesn’t gaijin want to add a separate Air Realistic Enduring confrontation mode in the Event tab like Simulator battles ?
Is it be because it wasn’t popular or was it due to unbalances, casue if they want to add modes like SEAD and air superiority to game, they should be a in separate mode from ARB.
Its in our plans as BVV mentioned, however at the moment, there isn’t any new news to share on that. When we do have some, it will be likely in a CM disclosure or more official place.
the game never had ww1, and personally I think its better off with out it, the ww1 mode was incredibly janky and not balanced at all,
they are still adding stuff for the cold war pretty commonly its just modern day has taken the front row seat, they havent completely abandoned cold war era stuff
any news on the BMPT either going up in BR or having its “external” ammo racks fixed to actually kill the crew?
the win rate even at 10.7 is still almost 70% with a 2.4KD, and pretty much every youtuber I have seen has also said the tank is just out right OP idk how much longer gaijin need to collect data on it
