(Which still dont render correctly)
As much as we pray for it, probably not.
[Insert vehicle], literally any of them, won’t appear.
They’re gonna feed us slop again and we all know it.
( as long as it doesn’t extend the queue times and caters to premiums. That’s the only rules)
1 Like
It’s the TF Mk.X. We already have the Mk.X ingame too:
The P-51D-20 would as well., we have 2 different P-51D-20s ingame at Rank III (Sweden a& China), the only reason the US one is Rank IV is because it was of the fact it was at a higher BR back in the day, and is a premium (meaning going down a rank makes it lose effectiveness).
Honestly knowing my luck at this point, we’ll probably end up with an A-4KU, A-4AR, AF-1B, and A-4N Meshupar but no US A-4M lol
5 Likes
IF.
They’re not going to add any more tech tree vehicles unless they’re top tier.
Gotta milk the people that aren’t brain-rotted by top tier slop tier.
1 Like
Yeah. Though there is still a chance, no matter how small/slight it might be.
I mean Gaijin did add the Hawk 200, Alpha Jet, L-39, Mb-326s, etc way after most people thought they’d be added… (this is just a copium/hopium concoction I’m on lol)
3 Likes
True, however if you look at it this way, they all also brought their own issues with them…
The Hawks were/ are trashy, the MB is completely and utterly busted half the time and the Alpha jets just exist.
I like them, don’t get me wrong but they won’t bother balancing them. Basically just like with any other light attack jet…
( Also the L-39 is a premium… Yipee ki yay)
1 Like
Yeah
(Semi-unrelated but I’m still waiting for Gaijin to add historical AIM-9J/Ps to the F-20, as well as fixing the cockpit displays lol)
1 Like
Whoop!
Battle rating changes are here! ^^
4 Likes
Time to see what their internal “statistics” had to say.
F-15J to 12.7 in ARB… lol
4 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT so you’re SERIOUSLY telling us that the “”“heavily reviewed”“” BR change list took THIS long to publish?
A short list like that that completely avoids the top tier premium bias and a whole lot of other things took this long?
Wow, real impressive.
3 Likes
The AIM-120C also doesn’t fit the F/A-18E, yet that is at a higher BR than the Gripen E.
The Gripen E as it is is already undertiered at 14.0 lol.
4 Likes
I just wanna be able to BVR. People are saying use the C for range but they don’t understand by the time the Gripen E reaches a high enough speed for 40KM I’d be fired at already. I DONT need higher range missile I just need the ONLY missile that is capable of saving its speed and managing its throttle the entire flight to its target. And that is the Meteor. They can nerf the range to balance but it’s not fair how they get the AIM 120C and are able to BVR meanwhile the C is practically useless on the Gripen E unless you get up to 10K height and atleast Mach 1.7 and fire for it to hit at 40KM. And once again by the time I’m doing that due to my lack of thrust I’d be fired at already. The Meteor fixes that problem since it manages its burn time and throttle. Don’t hate me for this but I wanna BVR like others not having to get fucked in the ass while trying to reach a high speed and altitude for me to fire.
1 Like
@Piciu713 good evening; ; one month ago gaijin had plans for changing the SPYDER, now that the provisional BR changes are out & there’s still no mention of SPYDER (BR/ordnance), is there anything you could forward us about gaijin’s goal with it? thank you!
2 Likes
But the point is, if they give Meteor to the Gripen E, they also give it to the Rafale and Typhoon. What would change?
2 Likes
Then give it to them atleast it’s balanced and everyone can BVR. I’m not dickriding any nation I just want every nation to actually be balanced and BVR. I don’t wanna have to wait till 30KM in the meantime some dick head fired 4 missiles at me and notch and by the time I’m in a notch someone else will fire at me.
1 Like
