And I explained to you what the focus for the tree has been:
I know, you say this all the time.
So does that mean WWII should be neglected?
Because Japan WWII TT has been neglected.
And you can talk about the BVVD Q&A, saying that the focus is top tier, but other nations receive WWII equipment for their TT. Yet, Japan does not.
Because I have answered you multiple times, but this same conversation from you seems to be raised every week at this point.
1 Like
Rank III Japan: 18 planes
Rank III US: 21 planes
Rank IV Japan: 15 planes
Rank IV US: 15 planes
Only counting TT, of course
That is hardly any difference
2 Likes
They put a 17 pdr at Rank II, so…
Is there a chance for a third line for the UK/Japan/France/Italy coastal tree?
Also any chance to return missing SB2M/SM.79/AR-2s?
Would Alecto II work?
Maybe.
A Gun Carrier based on the Universal Carrier would also be viable.
2 Likes
A third line would only be needed if there was sufficient vessels to place there. At the moment, none of those nations require it with their current vessel roster.
So when can we see more equipment of this type?
1 Like
Yeah, because other nations do receive their domestic WWII tech, yet we have to be happy with a C&P F-84G-21-RE, while 3 domestic designed aircrafts were removed.
Just like the British mains cope here. I cope for Japan.
And the British cope is way worse then me. Maybe that’s why they are receiving everything they ask for.
A number of coastal trees are in need of reliable counters to bully boats like Arras/Amiens, or anything that stands a chance in up tiers vs 3.7 frigates etc. You can sometimes be cheeky with a torpedo or artillery, but that’s not super reliable. And you won’t kill those vessels with a single 40mm Bofors like the Fremantle has.
2 Likes
Chief, almost every nation hasn’t recieved a TT WW2 plane in years by now. Only Germany recieving the 109 C-2 and the French recieving Fokkers comes to mind.
Stop acting like this is a Japan only problem.
Japan still lacks its primary night fighters (J1N1-S and J1N-1Sa), which is a weakness. Additionally, Japan still lacks attack aircraft (Ki-51, Ki-71, Ki-30, Ki-36, A6M7, and the properly armed Ki-102 Otsu). While the USSR, Germany, and the USA are renowned for their World War II attack aircraft, Japan also had them, and now the Ki-109 is the only one.
1 Like
Yeah, the Arras, Marne, Amiens and the Aisne really need to go down in br.
Not just that, but very important prototypes are missing as well, like the Nakajima LB-2 , Ki-93-I Kō , Kawasaki Ki-64 , Tachikawa Ki-74 , Tachikawa Ki-106 Hayate , Mansyū Ki-98 , Mansyū Ki-116, Mansyū Ki-71 and Kawasaki Ki-60
Same for production aircraft like the Mitsubishi Ki-46 , Mitsubishi G3M , Mansyū Ki-79 Kō and Aichi S1A1 Denko
Give us BMPT today
1 Like
Up more like
Honestly where Japan could actually use some love its their early ground TT. I know Japan isn’t very famous for its roster of WW2 tank designs, but it’s very much the most bare-bones low tier nation in the game along with Italy. (Israel doesn’t count so long as they don’t have Rank I-III)
2 Likes