Yeah… But you know. Soviets suffer
well I guess although id still go with 12.3
besides this whole argument, id still like to play it as an Event plane
Depends on exact weapons fit and how they are modeled, but yes, Id place it either at 12.0 or 12.3
why? the MiG-23M already has all of those features at 11.0 while being much more maneuverable and faster at 0-13km
1 Like
no no straight 12.3
like with maus which is set Firmly in the it can be defeated area MiG-25 should be too
23m has Mti? I thought only thr ML/MLA/MLD had it.
(youre correct)
Nah, 11.0 sounds fine to me. Wouldn’t want it any lower than that based on what it would encounter in a full downtier.
Yeah… them afterburners are gonna look comically big
yes
1 Like
at least it got a fuel tank with the amount of fuel of a mig23 capacity
no low on fuel
3 Likes
OH RIGHT
We havnt put its extremely low range into consideration either
Holy crap, I just checked. It in fact does. When did that get added? when they redid the MIg23 radars a few years back? Man i haven’t played the mig23m/mf in WAY too long lol.
and at the cost of being capped at 2.2G max Overload
without a fuel tank it has about a Similar max range to a MiG-29 without a Fuel tank
4.5G was a safety precaution, iirc it can do around 8G
Epic blitzkrieg had a bunch of stuff on this.
I wonder if he is still around?
1 Like
we have the Safety Precaution overloads in game tho
If they have to they can remove it from the foxbat
they can do as they did for the past 5 years and Make peace with the Idea of never adding a MiG-25 because it really wouldnt bring Joy to 99% of the Playerbase INCLUDING 80% of its Pilots
similar to the F-106A
1 Like
It could be fun in simulator battles.