well they could pay more attention to bug reports for things like loadout options locked out of one variant of an aircraft in one tree but not a different one when its known to be possible, but thats a larger issue
Fight Fire With Higher Fire Power!
They ignore them because they prefer how the vehicles is currently
You wont this is not the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter. Air to Air missiles will eat you alive still.
This thing will have a maximum BR 11.7 or less. The only thing that would pose a danger to me if it’s 12.7 would be a MiG-29 with an R27ER, but anyway, good luck climbing to 12-14 km altitude and trying to catch me above Mach 2.
4 Likes
Devblog from WT Mobile: USS South Dakota (BB-57)
3 Likes
Ahh the better statement for it. Thank you!
Rafale & F-16V for now, then F-15IA/1+ when more info arises about it, i’d expect I+ since it gets israeli avionics and ECM still, but with the AN/APG82 on the EX, which would be a good stopgap that’s not too farfetched
1 Like
More people would dislike that addition (plus it’s a complete waste of RSAF, functionally identical to current Ra’am) than Greece
agree on not liking the addition but this
just isnt true
There is virtually nothing the SG adds that Israeli Eagles don’t already have, or will receive in the future
Either way, RSAF should probably just be used to reinforce japanese high tier on the US side of things, because they can’t really get a better domestic F-15 or F-2
eh not really, there are still some meaningful differences from the Ra’am, if you are talking about the F-15IA that doesnt even exist yet.
not the F-15SG
Any particular reason? Literally nowhere better to go
All the deals have been made, as far as specifications go anyway.
If gaijin waits for the first IA to roll off the line it’ll be long DOA, they can just copy/paste the EX with the stated upgrades provided in numerous public pentagon & boeing documents
USA? joint USAF/RSAF squadron operating F-15SG which would just make it another top tier USAF jet.
You can have it, I literally couldn’t care.
My issue is with more mediocrity at israeli top tier, and the F-15SG is nothing but
2 Likes
Is there a possibility that Malaysia will be implemented in the Japanese subtree in the December major update?
I would be very happy if it is implemented.
Could be, but unlikely for this update. Very possible in the next one though
2 Likes
Okay just don’t turn at that speed your airframe will cry or you pilot will black out at best.
A lot of Italian players are not satisfied with subtree addition. A large part of playerbase’ve supported another - Spanish-Brazilian subtree idea, plus a rather poor and boring implementation of Romania/Hungary idea doesn’t help. I was actuallly the one more interested in Romania/Hungary, because of the possible heavy tank for the regular tree to be able complete daily/special/BP tasks within Italian TT (Gaijin made Tigris premium… so we can only hope for Hungarian IS-2 and if we are lucky 44M TAS, although imo it can only come in Dreams come true event at best) and multiple ingenious designs modifications (Toldies, V-4, Turans, Héja, Me 210Ca-1, IAR-80/81/93/99, LanceRs, TACAMs, Mareşal, TR-85s, TR-125, MLI-84 and multiple others), but Gaijin’s vice versa focused on copypasting, with a full ignorance towards Romanian stuff, which we are only getting thanks to @NovA29 and his usermade models.
4 Likes
I supoort Brazil as an Italian or American sub tree just because of the roided out Stuarts they made.
2 Likes