True, true, but they still have options - additions wise.
Boco my dear engine, save me !
1 Like
Look, I’m not saying we should stop adding domestic options, however, these minor or strugglijg trees need something to keep them going while those domestic vehicles are slowly added, now in the USSR’s case, they have a practically unlimited amount of content to add, and have absolutely no need for a subtree of vehicles that are already 85% similar to their own.
1 Like
Yeah an Iberian TT could work out well, A-7P, Alpha Jet A, F-16AM/BM, Super Tucano and possibly F-35 in the future from Portugal and EF-18A/B+ and M/BM, Eurofighter and F-5BM from Spain could be pretty nice.
Would be a small TT but would atleast be bigger than Israel on the count that it has the options for lower tier aircraft, still a lot of copy and paste but most of the stuff have unique modifications so there’s some differences from the base models.
3 Likes
Should probably just go to italy though, since none of things would be out of place there
well same goes for the loe2 right ? its the same thing over and over. but i think the only tech tree that need sub trees are sweden / china / maybe israel ? / japan.
I read your comments and wonder how someone can be this dense. The only nation that truly fits Russia is Belarus. Czechoslovakia and Poland used Soviet equipment, but theirs were heavily modified over time—to the point that these tanks can be considered original designs. They also incorporate a lot of NATO/Allied equipment.
Adding half of the Czech tanks to Russia and the other half somewhere else is beyond stupid.
10 Likes
Is there a fire ?
2 Likes
Don’t get me wrong.
If someone is against adding a sub-TT to the USSR - it’s going to be me.
Yet, the Russian community is big, and they want more unique stuff inside their TT.
Czech has already made it’s debute within the USSR despite it not being a sub-TT, and people loved it.
Adding Czech to the USSR will help it a lot at Rank VII+ with unique content.
My hopes are it won’t happen, but it likely will.
1 Like
please dont be a ship blog…
1 Like
XD
1 Like
There is literally no need to offend me. So why do you?
Look, you can disagree with me, but that’s how Gaijin has been balancing Heli BRs (when they actually did balance them lol).
Most of us can agree that a lot of Heli BRs are inconsistent, but that doesn’t change that having those extra two km lets you sit outside of the range of most SPAA/SAMs below 11.7.
Is the Superhind bad at 10.7? Yes.
Are there worse Helis at that BR range? Also yes.
Would Mokopas be balanced below 11.3? No.
Israel desperately needs a subtree, my Israeli lineup is woefully small compared to others:
Israel: (3 MBTs, 1 light tank, 1 heli, 1-2 cas jets) vs
germany: (7-8 MBTs, 1 heli, 1 light tank, 2 CAS jets, 2 SAMs)
Britain: (5-6 MBTs, 1-2 helis, 3 CAS jets, 2 SAMs)
And so on…
Greece is a great addition, cyprus not so much, but they add some much needed SHORAD systems, all together, Israel needs more MBTs, better SAMs and a new CAS platform alongside the F-16I
where does ussr/russia tree strugle ?
1 Like
I still don’t get why haven’t gotten the G3M yet.
from my experience they don’t mostly
Not really. There is no reason for Russia to get stuff like an AH-1Z, Gripen and F-35A just because they are in czech service.
Same goes for stuff like the Leopard 2s and CV90s.