Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Game Discussion General Discussion
4981

Lol, looking at the full message, it did not come with ESS like the premium one. But probably should as the hull is the same, it’s just the turret that is different.

4982

thats a bug report for the doing then

4983

Sad. Russian need some 11.3 to fill spaa line. People may call bais at this point

1 Like
4984

What about my French lineup? It goes from 9.7 to 12.0.

image
image1987×1215 284 KB

3 Likes
4985

Yeah, the situation for France, Italy, Japan and especially Israel still is pretty rough

1 Like
4986

But Soviets suffer.

Just look at top tier CAS, how are they coping without better CAS

/s

1 Like
4987

They could just move the 2S6 up to 11.3.

4988

Crazy how they will add higher BR vehicles but won’t fill the gap between the vehicle they add and the one before in the same update (or even several after). Then they decompress because they rushed to too high of a BR before fleshing stuff out and then it just leaves more gaps. Or in their infinite wisdom, they’ll add something to fill a gap at too low of a BR without foreseeing that it will be moved up eventually, and then that just solves and then recreates the problem (XM800T moment).

1 Like
4989

When Ariete C2 with Vulcano 120 ammunition?
@YaSen

4990

They will add it when other nations get electromagnetic cannons and laser weapons.

1 Like
4991

Probably… :(

1 Like
4992

how could volcanoes be applied in the game?

4993

Just implement it…

4994

Yeah of course, i just said that some tree need to be filled thier missing spaa

4995

and they should go to this trouble for a minor nation I don’t think so

4996

When C1 Ariete with armor not made of “heavy air”?

2 Likes
4997

This TBH…
It struggles so bad… Why doesn’t Gaijin do anything about it?

4998

It’s easy, they don’t want to put random data but at the same time they can’t have the real data because they are covered by secrecy, in fact we players ask for an armor to be competitive enough but they won’t put false data because of their policy of concreteness

4999

They want exact values on protection like the shell and at what distance armor protects against it or exact composition, but such values are classified. Their armor is modelled based on pure assumptions unfortunately. At least we have bug report accepted as a suggestion, so maybe we will get some explanation at least (doubt that they will change anything).

1 Like
5000

My suggestion i called it lmao YES!!! MY CAMO GOT PASSED

2 Likes