If it did, then perhaps it would be considered. But no sub tree is even close to that stage and the very fact something has been added as a sub tree means its already been taken to consideration if it can have a robust standalone tree or not, and proved not to be the case. Hence why it was made a sub tree in the first place.
2 Likes
Pakistani j10Cs are equipped with tvc and it gets regulaten in chinese j10s as well
No the only J-10 to have TVC was the prototype J-10B no J-10C has TVC by anyone
3 Likes
Tbh, with how India and Romania have been implemented I’ve kinda been against the USA or USSR getting subtrees. Or at least until a tree rework.
If it’s this bad with a 5 line nation, then imagine what it would be like with the 2 largest air trees and the third+first largest ground tree.
2 Likes
J10CE have thrust vector, but it will be added to to j10c fleet of china
No ?
1 Like
Hello dear admin. With all due respect, but I have an awkward question. What about sources of IRIS-T “buff”, where are they? In our game if machine needs a “buff”, gaijin provides one or more sources confirming this buff, so where are they? And why gaijin are so “generous” with that “buff ( yes it’s buff we all know ofc, no doubt )” given to IRIS-T, which was almost useless against MI-28NM and Z10ME? I apologize for this question, but I expect to receive a reasonable answer to it. Thank you.
Hey. The change is explained within the changelog. It was done to increase its IRCM resistance due:
1 Like
I would like a copy paste Su30mki and a copy paste rafale.
Idk why everyone is against copy paste
2 Likes
But it made it worse. Just say it was a nerf instead of lying.
Every other sam has a 10km ir range, but only the SLM is at 4km. Literally on par with an Aim9b
3 Likes
Because they have a nice habit of coming in place domestic or unique vehicles that would have fit better.
Looking at the last 2-3 subtrees they added and it doesn’t take a genius to see why people are getting annoyed.
As for the Rafale and Su-30 i would ge fine with them if they actually got unique armaments but knowing gaijin there is a good chance they wont do that.
3 Likes
Thanks. Yes, I’ve seen it. I won’t talk about “increasing the IRCM” and this is just nerf, but there are no official sources I’ve seen confirming these 4km change.Yes, it’s considered as buff ( how convenient ), but I remember when the RDF LT and HSTVL got their buff, it was supported by one source. In our case, there are no sources. If we all continue to play dumb, we can just ask: “Hey gaijin, you buffed the IRIS-T, it is so powerful and you’ve made it nore powerful, where are the sources of the buff and what the hell are you doing”. Again I apologize for all I said previously if it was offensive
2 Likes
Idk man, I like the variety they add to tt. Makes for some interesting line ups
Stinger acts better than this. So ig we should start to bring ozelot to 12.7, it may be more effective?..
1 Like
They get frustrating when there are so many more unique and/or native options avaiable to be added. Most of which are more interesting. Sub-TT C&Ps are rarely, if ever truly needed.
2 Likes
I like variety when its actually interesting and unique and not a carbon copy of something i have unlocked in another tree.
3 Likes
Imagine the Swiss ground subtree 💀 biggest waste of a counties arsenal imo
Like the whole reason i avoided grinding China for as long as i did despite their top tier lineup being something i really want is that i do not vibe with the idea of having to unlock my entire US and RU ww2 tree a second time just to get to the actually interesting stuff.
1 Like
I like it better when it’s carbon copy from other tech trees because that way you can play it on different sides for sim (blue/red side). I really want a blue side flanker (su-30) and mig-29 which is why I really want the Indian ones. Currently unless Italy is on blue side which isn’t guaranteed unlike Britain, you’re stuck with nato/western air craft on blue side a lot of the time
I cant wait for it to be and AMX-13, 2 Centurions, a CV-9030 and 2 leopard 2s and none of the MOWAG vehicles or PZ58/68 tanks that Switzerland is known for
1 Like