I doubt it, seeing as the US is already getting the Super Hornet (confirmed), Fireball (confirmed), M10 Booker (confirmed) and NASAMS (according to the list).
M10 Booker also has the problem of it being super easy to place too high in terms of BR.
I can see Gaijin putting it at 11.3 or 11.7, where no sane person would play it voluntarily.
MiG-25 is an event vehicle, so I’m not suprised they show it off a lot.
fair enough, i rarely play arcade
I assume Gaijin also want them introduced in Naval RB though, which is probably what causes the issue
I prefer RB as well, idk how to make them playable there.
But can we breed the bread tho?
in the current meta, probably make them spawn near the middle of the map so they can intercept battleships
Far from ideal though, for battleships, but also for submarines. They would need to rework the entire game mode which is probably what is delaying their arrival
Yea, cap zones are pretty much the biggest ticket bleeder in naval, some matches just last 2 literal minutes because a dude in a motorboat rushed all 3 points
Imagine waking up to find all this bread!
I don’t know what’s going on, but it’s ok.
WHY J-10C in trailer has AL-31 ENGINE…
Big cope for Su-35 and modern radar missiles on dev stream
@Smin1080p_WT , since UK gets Ajax.
Can we later get overwatch? The problem is it uses only ARH Brimstone. Can it be implemented as laser guided Brimstone?
U can sort of see, since the WS10 and AL31 has different structures; but the performance depends heavily on FM, since this in theory is a new FM with new intakes nose cone and all that, the weight could vary heavily, the thrust can also vary, radar is unknown what the devs will make of it.
Sure but I suspect this is due to Gaijin wanting to get a PL-12 capable and a PL-15 capable J-10C.
J-10A’s issue is not thrust, it’s drag. It’s post Mach 1 drag is so excessive that it feels like towing a truck behind it. J-10C should have sth along the lines of 13 or 14 tonnes of thrust (if we can get FN-5 engines)
Nope all aesa.
Think there is a website that may have mentioned it, need to check whether this was AVIC’s one or the export one to check.
I don’t mind ‘early’ or 31, just hope they don’t handicap it with more stuff, since 31 can still have 14 t thrust.
There is next to no correlation.
dev stream today?
As much as i’d like to see it, the Lavi is 13.0 material at the very best, and it would play like a signifigantly inferior J-10A or with a far worse less missiles, no HMS, similar radar, stuck with python & derby.
Probably in the realms of a Gripen FM given the engine
J-10C on the other hand is China’s primary frontline light fighter, and they’ve desperately been waiting for something new since I’ve been finding the J-10A a bit stale, and the M2K can’t compete as well as Rafale
Probably
I don’t understand why they have to always handicap china? Like even J-11B 14.0 br at start for example. Like it’s obvious that when people hear J-10C, they think of ws-10b in it, not the “early”, not the “middle”, just give us best variant that exist irl. Why J-10C has to be some “early” stuff, while Rafale from YEAR ago is F3, which has absolutely all benefits of F4. That’s just absolutely unfair
Me in my eurofighter missing 60% of its irl kit…
It’s not like J-10C gonna have it’s real kit either, but the problem is that it won’t even have it’s supposed to be flight performance as of now, while EF is complete fantasy UFO
